PEEHISTORIC ART. 



537 



Muller ' and (2) Kannt Hemieberg.' The first gentleman conclndes that 

 both horns were the work of one and the same people, that none of the 

 figures had any relation to Scandinavian mythology, but have a greater 

 relationship with the Mongols, perhaps had been brought from Siberia, 



M mwmJWfm^fimmmmMm i 



M'';KinJ'!\'.i'^!'l'''''nH!M!^J!!!!l''J!lH!l|^l^!!!!!'H!ijH!H'M l'St!JJ"^^^ 





-vvyvvY 



* Kv ^-'V^AW 1i oT ?~v 'i^r 



Fig. 77. 



DETAILS OF SECOND GOLDEN HOBN, FIVE BANDS (fig. 175). 



' "Aiiti(inarisk Umlersiigelse over <le ved Gallehnns fundne Gnld-lioni (an arcluR^ 

 oloj-ic examination of the gold horns fonnil near Gallehnns). Cop<-nhageu, kSO() 

 quarto, with designs of the two horns engraved hy G. L. Lahde." 



'-"Hvad er Edda? eiler Kaisonneret kritisk Undersogelso over de tvendeved Gal- 

 lehuus fundne Guld-horn. (What is this hut the Edda; or a critical examinatiou 

 and argument as to the two horns <lisinteried near Gallehuus.) Aahorg, 1812, 

 quarto, with designs engraved by J. Flint." 



