ON THE RUBI LIST IN 'LONDON CATALOGUE,' ED. 9. 81 



R. BoRAEANus Genev. Ess. Mon. pp. 154-156 ; Journ. Bot. 1892, 

 267. No. in Set, 61. 4 v.-c. (3, 27, 28, 62). This plant and the 

 next, though not yet widely found in Britain, are locally abundant. 



R. cuRviDENS A. Ley, Jonm. Bot. 1894, 143. 2 v.-c. (36, 44). 



R. MucRONATUs Blox. 52 v.-c. (1-6, 8-11, 16, 17, 20, 22, 27, 

 32, 34, 86, 38-40, 43, 46, 47, 49, 54, 55, 57, 58, 62-64, 67, 69, 70, 

 81, 84-86, 88, 91, 92, 96-98, 100, 102, 103, 105-107, 110). I. 

 A local plant in my experience, though so remarkably widespread. 



The R. BannintfU Focke, described and placed provisionally as a 

 YSiV. of R.JHUcrontitus in Jouni. Z?o(. 1892,268, B. eruhcscens WiYtg.,B,nd. 

 B. melanoxylon M. & W. are omitted as not being certainly British. 



R. Gelertii Frider. Journ. Bot. 1894, 108 (for this and var.). 

 2 v.-c. (25, 27). 



Var. criniqer Linton. 7 v.-c. (22, 27, 28, 36, 39, 57, 58). I. 



R. ANGLosAxoNicus Gelert, Journ. Bot. 1890, 166; 1892, 269. 

 No. in Set, 16. 15 v.-c. (2-6, 8, 9, 11, 16, 22, 36, 38, 49, 56, 57). 

 I. [23, 27] . 



Var. raduloides Rogers, Journ. Bot. 1892, 269 (for this and the 

 next var.). No. in Set, 62. 10 v.-c. (6, 9, 16, 17, 34-36, 40, 42, 

 43). [57, 58] . 



Var. setuloms Rogers. B. infestus Bab. (in part). 5 v.-c. (4, 5, 

 34-86). [23] . Extreme examples of this var. are so very 

 Koehlerian in character, that nothing but the fact of their seeming 

 to be connected with B. analosaxonicus by a series of intermediate 

 forms can, I think, justify its continuance in this place. 



R. infestus Weihe, B. G. p. 77, t. 80. 10 v.-c. (5, 6, 17, 22, 38, 

 49, 59, 65, 86, 97). I. [40, 58, 70, 72] . In some cases I believe this 

 name was rightly applied by Bloxam, as no doubt by Prof. 

 Babington also. 



R. uncinatus p. J. Muell. Journ. Bot. 1894, 47. 3 v.-c. (34, 

 35, 38). Mr. Bagnall's Hill Hook plant, on account of which 

 I have credited Warwickshire (38) with this species, man prove 

 different; but I think it a small form of uncinatus, which Dr. Focke 

 now thinks best placed in this group of "transition forms." 



R. Borreri Bell- Salt. Jouni. Bot. 1892, 270. No. in Set, 88. 

 9 v.-c. (3-6, 8-10, 84, 85). I. 



Var. dentatifolius Briggs, Journ. Bot. 1894, 46. No. in Set, 63. 

 8 v.-c. (8, 4, 9). 



Var. vinndtonan k. Ley, Journ. Bot. 1894, 148. 8 v.-c. (36, 37, 40). 



R. Leyanus Rogers, n. sp. No. in Set, 64 ("i?. Drejeri'). 

 15 v.-c. (1-5, 8, 24, 36, 38, 89, 41, 42, 44, 49, 57). L First 

 described, I believe, by me, in Journ. Bot. 1892, 271, under the 

 name "i?. Drejeri G. Jensen," suggested by Dr. Focke. It had 

 been previously referred to in B. E. C. Rep. 1886, 149, and in Fl. 

 Here/. 520, as R. Purchasii Blox. From the latter plant, which 

 Mr. Purchas now considers indistinguishable from R. mucronatus 

 Blox., it is certainly distinct ; and a good series of specimens of 

 Jensen's Drejeri, for which I am indebted to Messrs. Gelert and 

 Friderichsen, have shown me conclusively that it cannot bear that 

 name. Under these circumstances, it is with great pleasure that 

 I find myself free to name it after its discoverer, the Rev. Augustin 

 Journal of Botany. — Vol. 38. [March, 1895.] g 



