ON THE RtJBI LIST IN 'LONDON CATALOGUE,' ED. 9. 103 



Painter), and "7i. insulatxis Auct., nou P. J. Muell. nee Genev." 

 (Shooter's Hill, W. Kent, A. H. Wolleij Dod); but I have omitted 

 them from our list because the former is probably a hybrid, while 

 of the latter Dr. Focke writes to mc : "I think the forms of 

 'insulatus' will prove to be a status horridus of various glandular 

 Eubi." 



R. Marshall! Focke & Sogers, n. sp. Jouni. Bot. 1892, 340 

 {R. Koehh'd var. hirsutus). No. in Set, 46. 7 v.-c. (16, 17, 22, 23, 

 34, 36, 49). The description in Jonm. Bot. 1892, being fairly full. 

 It seems only necessary to add a few remarks here as the result of 

 Dr. Focke's and my closer observation of the living plant in several 

 counties last summer. Marked features, besides those emphasised 

 in my former description, are the comparative smallness of the 

 leaves, the great length of the lower panicle-branches, which are 

 not always ascending, but often diverging at nearly right angles 

 and forming secondary panicles, and the brownish tint of the young 

 fruits, by which the plant may often be recognized at a distance. 

 The sepals usually become patent soon after the petals fall ; and in 

 the Carnarvonshire plant they commonly loosely embrace the young 

 fruit. The hairiness, which is characteristic of the typical plant of 

 the more southern counties, is less marked in the W. Gloucester one, 

 and altogether wanting in the strong Carnarvonshire form, which 

 also has larger flowers, and leaves nearly naked beneath. First 

 observed by the Eev. E. S. Marshall and me in 1890 at Munstead 

 and Witley, S.W. Surrey, it is quite a marked feature of the 

 bramble flora in that neighbourhood (especially at Haslemere), and 

 is evidently widely spread elsewhere in England, though believed by 

 Dr. Focke to be unknown on the Continent. 



E. Fusco-ATER Weibe, Journ. Bot. 1894, 48. 2 v.-c. (17, 57). 

 [36]. 



E. viRiDis Kalt. Journ. Bot. 1890, 166; 1893, 3. No. in Set, 23. 

 11 v.-c. (15-18, 22, 23, 34, 35, 38, 43, 55). I. 



E. DuROTRiGUM E. p. Murray, Journ. Bot. 1892, 15; 1893, 4. 

 No. in Set, 24. 1 v.-c. (9). 



E. DivExiRAMUs P. J. Muell. Journ. Bot. 1893, 4. No. in Set, 47. 

 4 v.-c. (3, 34-36). 



E. AcuTiFRONs A. Ley, Journ. Bot. 1893, 13, 45. 1 v.-c. (36). 

 [6, 49] . 



E. sAxicoLUs p. J. Muell. Journ. Bot. 1893, 5. 5 v.-c. (13, 22, 

 23, 43, 57). I. [5, 35] . A very ill-defined "species" (see B. E. C. 

 Hep. 1893, 411). 



E. Eellardi W. & N. Journ. Bot. 1893, 5. No. in Set, 73. 

 10 v.-c. (5, 11, 14, 15, 17, 23, 32, 36, 39, 49). I have seen specimens 

 from all the ten vice-counties here enumerated, and feel no doubt 

 in their determination. The following are much more uncertain 

 [7, 34, 37, 40, 62] . 



Var. b. dentatus Bab. I'Jvfj. Bot. 3rd ed. Supp. 115. 7 v.-c. (4, 

 17, 22, 23, 38, 55, 63). A plant not easily placed, appearing some- 

 what intermediate between U. Bellardi and R.foliosus. 



E. sERPKKS Weihe, Journ. Bot. 1893, 6. No. in Set, 74. 4 V.-c. 

 (5, 35-37). 



