138 THE JOURNAL OF BOTANY 



P. oxyptera Eeichb. Holwick Scars, 1911, v.-c. 65. 



Arenaria uliginosa Schleich. In good quantity in its well- 

 know locality in both 1892 and 1911. 



A. gothica Fr. Seen in three stations in the Ingleborongh 

 district, v.-c. 64. 



Sacjina nodosa Fenzl. E. side of Ingleborough, v.-c. 64. 

 ■•'•Montia laviprosijerma Cham. Holwick Fell, 1911, v.-c. 65. 



Geranium pratense L. Near Malham village, v.-c. 64, a 

 beautiful form occurred with pale lilac flowers. 



G. luciclum L. Near Great Musgrave and laneside near Hill- 

 beck, Brough, W., 1911. 



Vicia sylvatica L. Swindale Beck, Brough, W., 1892. 



Dryas octopetala L. Plentifully in flower in 1892 in its only 

 Teesdale station ; not a single blossom showing in 1911, although 

 leaves were in abundance. 



Geuvi rivale x 2irhanum {intermedium Ehrh.). Barnard Castle, 

 with the parents, D., 1892. 



Alchemilla alpestris Schmidt. Forest-in-Teesdale and High 

 Force, D., 1911. -Near Cronkley Fell, v.-c. 65, 1911. 



'■'■"A. minor Huds. Forest-in-Teesdale, D., 1911. Mickle Fell, 

 v.-c. 65, 1911. 



Saxifraga nivalis L. In its Westmoreland station in fair 

 quantity in 1892 ; we failed to hit the right spot in 1911, but my 

 friend Mr. A. Wallis tells me he saw it in 1913 (see J. G. and E. G. 

 Baker in Journ. Bot. 1894, pp. 302, 345). 



Galium sylvestre Poll. Forest-in-Teesdale and limestone ridge 

 near Ettersgill Beck, D., 1911. Limestone hills above Brougli, 

 W., 1911. 



■■'Valeriana Mikanii Syme. Near High Force, D., 1911. 



Matricaria suaveolens Buchen. Too common near Clapham, 

 v.-c. 64. 



Senecio spatMilcefolitts DC. Seen in its station near Brough, 

 Westmoreland, in 1892, in plenty, but with no signs of its 

 attempting to flower or having flowered ! In 1911 the conditions 

 were exactly the same, and I was interested to hear from 

 Mr. J. Backhouse that he has never seen it in flower in this — its 

 only inland locality in Britain — where his father discovered it. 

 Some rosettes were brought back to Keigate in 1911 and planted 

 in chalky soil ; these flowered sparingly in 1912, but luxuriantly 

 and well in 1913, some of the stems bearing twenty-four 

 heads! 



Mr. J. G. Baker has an interesting note upon the plant in this 

 Journal for 1885, p. 8, where he remarks that the dividing line 

 between S. spathulcefolius DC. and S. campestris DC. is very hard 

 to define; in this opinion I concur. He goes on to say: " Accord- 

 ing to Grenier & Godron, there is no campiestris at all in France, 

 but all the French plant is spathulcefolius. But cross the Channel 

 and immediately on the chalk downs of Sussex and the Isle of 

 Wight campestris begins, and there is no spatkulcBfoliiis till the 

 whole breadth of England and Wales is ci-ossed. Speaking from 

 a geographical point of view, one would not care to believe in 



