1919] SCHNEIDER, NOTES ON AMERICAN WILLOWS. V 19 



was collected by W. L. Jepson, Napa River Basin, Howell Mt., May 8, 

 1893 (No. 29s, fr. juv.; Jeps.; folia semi-evoluta ad 6 :1 cm. magna). 



6c. S. lasiandra var. caudata Sudworth in Bull. Torr. Dot. Club, xx, 43 



(1893); in Bull. U.S. Dept. Agric. Div. For. xiv. 121 (Nomencl. Arb. Fl.) 

 (1897), pro parte max. — Bebb ^ in Gard, & For. viii. 372 (1895), ex 

 parte. — Sargent, Silva N. Am. ix. 116, t. 470 (1896); Man. Trees N. Am. 

 174 (1905), pro parte. — Ball in Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis, ix. 74 (1899), 

 pro parte max. — Schneider in 111. Handb. Laubh. i. 29, figs. 15b-c, 1904, — 

 Piper in Contrib. U.S. Nat. Herb. xi. 213 (Fl. Wash.) (1906), pro parte 

 max. — Piper & Beattie, Fl. S.E. Wash. 73 (1914). — Henry, Fl. S. Brit. 

 Col. 96 (1915), — S. pentandra caudata Nuttall, N. Am. Sylva i. 61, t. 18 

 (1843). — S. Fendleriana Andersson in Ofv. Svensk. Vetensk. Akad. Forh. 

 XV. 115 (1858), pro parte, quoad spec. Geyeri No, 287. — Howell, Fl. N.W. 

 Am. I, 617 (1902), pro parte max. — Rydberg, Fl. Colo. 94 (1906), pro 

 parte max.; FL Rocky Mts. 191 (1917), pro parte max. — Ball in Coulter & 

 Nelson, New Man. Rocky Mts. Bot. 130 (1909), pro parte max. ; in Bot. Gaz, 

 Lx. 397 (1915). — Visher in Muhlenb. ix. 71 (Add. FL S. Dak.) (1913). 

 Wooton & Standley in Contrib. U.S. Nat. Herb. xix. 213 (1915), pro 

 parte. — *S. arguta Andersson in Svensk. Vetensk. Akad. Handl. vi. 32, 

 t. 2, fig. 22 (Monog. Salic.) (1867), pro parte et excl. var.; In De Candolle, 

 Prodr. XVI.2 206 (1868), pro parte et excL var. /3, 7, 8. — ? S. arguta *S. 

 pallescens alpigena Andersson in Svensk. Vetensk. x\kad. Handl. vi. 33 

 (Monog. Salic.) (1867). — ? 5. arguta 6 alpigena Andersson in De Candolle, 



L 



Prodr. xvi.^ 206 (1868). — S. lasiandra var. Fendleriana Bebb apud Watson 

 Bot. Cal. II. 84 (1879), pro parte max.; in Coulter, Man. Rocky Mts. Bot. 

 334 (1885), pro parte max. — Sargent, Rep. For. N. Am. 167 (1884). — S. 

 lucida var. lanccolata Hooker ex Bebb in Gard. & For. viii. 373 (1895), 

 pro synon. — S. lasiandra Rydberg in Mem, N.Y. Bot, Gard. i. 110 (Cat. 

 Fl. Mont.) (1900), non Bcntham. — Britton & Shafer, N. Am. Trees 

 190, fig. 148 (1908), pro parte max. — S. caudata Heller in Muhlenb. 11. 186 



(1906). — Daniels in Univ. Mo. Stud. Sci. Ser. 11. 247 (FL Bould., Colo. 

 99.) (1911). 



In its typical form this variety is well marked, and its history has already 

 been discussed by Ball (1899). As I have previously stated Ball included 

 Andersson's S. Fendleriana \\-hich, however, sensu stricto belongs to typical 

 S, lasiandra or to a new form of it, Britton and Shafer have applied the 

 name S, lasiandra Bentham to var. caudata and taken up the name S. 

 Lyallii for the true S. lasiandra. The distribution of var. caudata according 

 to the material I have been able to examine is as follows : From northern 

 New Mexico (Rio Arriba County, fide Wooton and Standley) the eastern 



^ According to Bebb the oldest nume for this variety is S. lucida var. lanccolata said to have 

 been used by Hooker, Fl. Bor.-Am. 11. 148 (1839), but Hooker did not make such a variety, 

 he only mentions a 8. lucida *'^ foliis lanceolatis" without indicating which of the specimens 

 enumerated by him represents this form. Bebb stated that the type of Hooker's variety *'is 

 no, 39 of the Hooker, Barratt and Torrey distribution" in the Kew Herbarium. J have not 

 yet seen this specimen which was collected by Drummond in the Rockies at Jasper Luke, and 

 1 believe it does not belong to var. caudata but to S. lucida. 



