1920] SCHNEIDER, NOTES ON AMERICAN WILLOWS. VII 151 



author himself in 1868. The second variety had originally been described 

 without a type specimen, but in 1868 Andersson cites " Unalascha [sic] 

 (Eschscholz)." It seems to me that this form too cannot be distinguished 

 from the type. The third variety is according to the author's quotation in 

 1868 founded on specimens collected '' in Sitcha et Unalaschka (Herb. 

 Petrop.) " which are unknown to me. So far as I can judge by the de- 

 scription ** foha paullum breviora, J poll, lata, exacte lanceolata, tenuia, 

 glabriuscula, Integra, subconcoloria facile nigrescentia, stipulis fere nuUis 

 ornata," this form may be identical with what has been described by Bebb 



as S. conjiincta. 



Parry on Mt. Adams in Wash 



ington, and I have seen it and the other co-types cited by Bebb in his her- 

 barium at the Field Museum. Bebb himself said later (apud Coville in 

 Contr. U.S. Nat. Herb. iv. 198 (Bot. Death Val. Exp.) (1893)) that his S. 

 conjunda '' does not differ from the Alaskan type " of S. Barclayi, and it is 



ery 



As 



Mustifol 



the specimens of the Herb. Petrop. Even the typical S. conjuncta is at 

 present rather uncertain because I have not yet seen mature leaves which 

 undoubtedly belong to the form which Bebb cites as his type. In 1914, 

 Ball in the Herbarium of the Geological Survey of Canada has made S. 

 conjuncta a variety of S. Barclayi, and there are the following specimens 

 which may be referable to such a variety sensu Ball. All of them need 

 further observation. 



Washington 



mania County: Mt. Pa 

 type, G. co-type of S. conju 

 9. m.. f.: C. G.l: same Mt 



w 



Adams, wet meadows. August 4, 1892, L. F. Henderson (fr.; Pu.). 



Oregon. Wallowa County: Higher Wallowa Mts., near the Lake, August 2, 

 1899, W, C. Cusick (No. 2302. m., f.; C, G,, M.; "a low shrub"; of the male speci- 

 men in Cor. the filaments are partly united). 



Montana. Gallatin County: Bold Mt., 2300-2G00 m., July 21, 1880, S. 

 Watson (No. 372 ^, f.; G.; one of the co-types of S. conjuncta, a rather uncertain 

 form). 



Columbia 



woods, Ma\ 



1890, J. Macoun (No. 9 [-= 24266, 0.], m., f.; named by Ball in 1914 S. Barclayi con- 

 juncta, but without old leaves difficult to identify properly) ; same locality, date and 

 coll. (No. 2, m., f.; A.; bracteis plus minusve subcrispato-sericeis, ceterum ut prae- 

 cedens, foliis superne stomatiferis). New Westminster District : Chilli- 

 wack Valley, about 1850 m., July 29, 1901. J. M. Macoun (No. 20907, O.; f.; G.; 

 same state as No. 24266, pedicellis pilosis, foliis superne stomatibus numerosis 

 instructis). 



Mts 



imi 



The type of S. Barclayi "^hebecarpa Andersson in Svensk. Vetensk. Akad. 

 Handl. VI. 165 (Monog. Salic.) (1867) w^as collected by Kastalski in Una- 

 laschka, and the author said: " Cum S. Barclayi nuperrime descripta omni- 



gruit 



As 



I have already stated, even the ovaries of Andersson's type of S. Barclayi 



