_i 



* -# 



'^ #1 



torilrti, ^ o M V s Primus , * fi - 



prio tcftimotiio de Ariftolochia mentit.En pclari Dialedici argumentat* 



qm Tuberetemcid cftjprimcCyclamiiii radice)fitut pifces necent,Mai^ 



lo terrejioceft, Ariftolochif rotud^ radice fieri no poteft* Fallit Plinius» 



quiid uidifTc fe fcribitrno fallitur Nicolaus.qui audilTe fe dicitCAtPlini^ 



us inquit,radicem Cyclamini id etia efficere fcribit» Verii id quide Leoni 



certe:fed tertfas Cyclamini.cognomine Chamecifsi , cuiusnonrotunda, 



fed fparfa fit radixmt lande agnofcas fine mente te debere , quod de Ra^ 



po terrarteperfijadereconaris* An c^cij,uel mendace fuifle Pliniu putas 



NicoIae,cum Campanos pifcatores Malo terrac calcem mifcere,pifcesq^ 



necare uidifte fe fcribitCNum impofsibile quiddam , aut fupra fidem di 



xifie tibi uifus eft PliniusCSed et Tithymalu, cogoomine Cory mbiten U 



bro.5.&:.2o,et Laduca caprinam lib»2o.eofde pr^ftarein necandis pifci 



bus effedus,ide ipfe Phnius tradit, Verbafco herba tam fluuiales ^ lacu 



ftres pifces interimi.Et marinos etia a Phccnicibus hocmodo cap* 7«hi> 



ftorise animaliu Ariftoteles fcribit^Nos quocp experimeto,uifucp didici 



mus,& Cucumerem afininu,et uiridia nucii putamina contuCi idem effi 



cere pofte.Quonia ergo & CycIamino,et Corymbite, & Lacluca capri;^ Pifciutn ; 



na,&uerbafco,etcucumereafinino,etiugIandiucorticibuspi(cesnecan "prura* j 



tur,erra£ Plinius,qui Ariftolochiae radicc necari dixit^Num tib 



deaiftauident,Ariftotehceeuedemonftrationes,quibusinexpugnabik 

 tierunecefrariofequaturCTumconcludenspergiXatcpinhuncmodum 



dicis* Aut imur fatendu eft^duas eflTe radices,qua? eofdem prarftent effi 



^ustautilluddicendum erit, Cyclaminij rotunda^ra^dicis . quartum efle 

 lAriftoIochi^penus.Vndeiftaobfecrofatendi,dicaidic«neceflitasNi> 



olaeCPrimii quidem non duas modo herbas,quap pifces necent, fed fi 

 adduximusrmultascpidem effieerepofle,n6dubitamus. Numgrande, 

 autmirandu quiddam putes,fidu£cpluresueherba?idem pofsintrDe/n 

 de.quia Cyclaminus pifces necat , Ariftolochiasgenus erit quartumC At 

 quintum dixifTes, Ariftolochiscenim genera quatuorPlimus enumerat«. 



PariergorationeCorymbites,TithymaIus,etLa(Suracaprin&,&:uerb 

 fcum,&: cucumer afininus.etiuglandium corticcs,quia pifccs necant,in^ 

 ter Ariftolochiegenera reponentur:quafi unum cftedlum , non nifi Uni^ 

 «s herba? genus*^pra?ftare poflitCQuod nec Aniculx quide dicerent, auC 

 cmpiriconi quifquam. At de Ariftolochia quod pifces 



quisautorefcriptureperiturXegiftineomncsautoresLeoniceneCNotl 

 nc cpo te in tripolio monui,oportere eum,qui ita arguit , fegifle , intelle^ j , 



fle,& memoria temiiSe omnes,qui unqua fcripfere autores:quo argus^ 

 menri h uius formula &: ratio conftare pofsit C Sed noiie omnibus auto^ 

 ribus rei ipfius eqidentia potiorCHanc radicem etianum Campanimelii 

 terragn5,hoceft, Malum terra^uulgodicunt: & in pifcatu pafsim adhi> 

 bent» Qiiod uir illuflris , acerrimiqj i udicf] Sigifmundus Eftenfis frater 

 |uus,Dux incly te (cum hxc proderemus) nobis retulitv At quasnam ifta 



peruicada^rqua: frontis duricies^T^juae impudetia cftC a nullo autorc fcrii; 



> 



» 



r 



r 



I 



.-f 



