92 AUT. BOT. 



win, mistaken for E. hdlioscopia by Muhlen- 

 berg and Elliot, but quite unlike. Pedall, eaves 

 uncial narrovv, flovvers very small 4lobe. 



642, Tithym. heliosQopia R. Euph. O — Eu- 

 ropa, it has leaves cuneaie acute serrulate, um- 

 bel 5fid, capsules smooth. 



643, Tithym.paliistris R. Euph. O— Europa. 



644, lCithym, ohovata Raf. (E. helioscopia 

 norinulis non L.) fol. obovatis serratis obtusis 

 glabris, inferis petiolatis, umbella 5fida 3fida, 

 invol. 5-3 conformis, capsuhs glabris — Novan- 

 glia ad Kentuky, Anglia ad Sicilia*&c annual 

 pedal, leaves exactly like E. peplus, but. larger 

 and serrate, umbel not trifid. It appears to be 

 deemed E. helioscopia both in America and 

 Europe, altho' quite distinct from it by leaves 

 neither narrow^ nor acute. 



645, Tithym. paralias R. — Eu!*opa mariti^ 

 mis. 



646, Tithym. saxatilis R. — Styria, Illyria. 



647, Tithym. apios R. — Creta, tuberosa pi^ 

 losa fol. oblongis, rara. t- 



648, Tithym. cristata Raf. Euph. cornuta 

 Lr. — Egypt invol. cristato dentatis non cornutis, 



649, Tithym. calendula R. Euph. do Delile 

 — Egypt. 



650, Tithym. connata Raf. pumila pubes- 

 cens, fol. sess. obK vel cuneatis acutis integris ; 

 umbellis dichotomis, invol. subrot. obt. sepe con- 

 natis — Syria, sent me as E. aleppica^ which has 

 setaceous leaves^ apparently new, but the spe- 

 cimen is imperfect j 



651, Keraselma exigua R. Euph. O. — Eu- 

 ropa, fol. hn. lanc. acutis cuspidatis. For this 

 G. of Necker sec fi. tel. 1184. 



652, Keras. retusa R. Euph. O.— Hisp. Gah- 

 lia, fol. cuneat. linearib, retusis. Sent me by 2 

 botanists as Exigua, 



