AFPEXDIX. 383 



Page 104. Sp. 3*. Pamphila Acteeon. Espcr. — Curtis, v. x. pi. ^V2. 



A/is supra Jul vo-f III vis, anticis Untold nigra macuUsque luteis; posticis immacu- 



laiis. (Exp. Alar. 1 unc. 1 — 2lin.) 

 Wings above tawny-brown; anterior with a black streak, and a row ofluteous 



spots ; posterior immaculate : in the female the black streak is wanting on 



the anterior wings. 

 I am indebted to the Rev. J. Lockey for this species ; it was found by him in 



plenty near the " Burning ClifF," in Dorsetshire : it has also been taken at 



Lul worth Cove, in the same county, in August. 



Page 102. Pam. Bucephalus. Wood Iiul. Ent.pl. iii./. 82. (^.— The spechnen 

 here figured was taken by Mr. Newman, near Godalming. 



Page 105. I NO Staticcs. Curtis, v. ix. pi. 396— Again we have the wrong 

 larva figured in this work by copijiiig Hiibner's figures, the nomenclature of 

 which is so frequently faulty. The larvae I have had agree with Sepp's 

 figures, vol. iv. pi. xl. 



Page 108. Anthrocera Trifolii. Wood Ind. Ent.pl. iv.f. 4 (not 3). — Found 

 in Cambridgeshire in Sept. — Rev. L. Jenyns. 



Page 109. An. Loti. Wood Ind. Ent. pi. iv. /. 3 (not 4). 



Page 110. An. Filipendulae. Zyg. Chrysanthemi of Hubner appears to be a 

 variety of the female, with the posterior wings scarcely bordered with 

 black. 



Page llOf. An. Pucedani. " Alis anticis nigro-cyaneis maculis scv ruhris 

 .suhtus conjluentibus ; posticis rubris margine late cyaneo ; ahdomine cingido 

 ruhro, antcnnis upicc albis." — Och. Stcph. Cafal. ii. 30. A'o. 5906, note. 



Anterior wings blue-black, with six red spots, confluent beneath; posterior 

 red, with a broad hlue margin : abdomen with a red belt: tip of the antennae 

 white. 



Introduced erroneously as British by Wilkes, in mistake for An. Filipendulae. 



Page 111. Smerinthus ocellatus. Curtis, v. x\. pi. 482. 



Page 112. Smerinthus Populi. Wood Ind Ent. pi. 4./. 9 {not 8). 



Page 113. Sm. Tiliac. Wood Ind. Ent.pl. 4,./ 8 (not 9). 



Page 118. Sphinx. In Loudoii's Mag. v. v. p. 149, are some remarks as to 

 the non-admission of Sp. Carolina, &c. into the British List, to which I can 

 merely refer the reader, my limits not permitting me to demonstrate the 

 insuflaciency of the conclusions of the anonymous writer. I may, however, 

 remark, that as 1 have never yet seen an insect from the American continent 

 corresponding in every respect with any one of the Old World — and I have 

 seen thousands therefrom — I therefore continue firmly of opinion that natives 

 of fliaf country cannot be indigenous in this. 



