No. 64] DIPTERA OF CONNECTICUT : MORPHOLOGY 129 



(1924). Some special features of the wings of Diptera. Inscc. In- 



scit. Menstr., 1924, pp. 34-36, 1 pi. 



(1927). On the characteristics of the occiput in the Diptera. Proc. 



Ent. Soc. Washington, 29, pp. 47-48. 



Sharp, D. (1897). On the use of the term tegula in Diptera. Entom. Month. Mag- 

 azine, 8, p. 50. 



Sinton, J. A. (1925). The hypopvgium of the female Phlebotomus. Indian Jour. 

 Med. Research, 13, pp. 97-107, 3 pis. 



. (1927). The value of the female genitalia in the identification of spe- 

 cies of Phlebotomus. Indian Jour. Med. Research, 14, pp. 933-954, 1 pi., 15, pp. 

 21-40, 5 pis. 



Sinton, J. A. and Covell, G. (1927). The relation of the morphology of the buccal 

 cavity to the classification of anopheline mosquitoes. Ibid., 15, pp. 301-308, 5 

 pis. 



Smirnov, E. S. (1925). U. den Bau des maennlichen genital System der Dipteren. 

 Biol. Mitt. Zool. Timirazefif, Moscow Zool. Lief. 1, pp. 39-56, 34 figs. 



Smith, J. B. (1890). A contribution to a knowledge of the mouthparts of the Dip- 

 tera. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc, 17, pp. 319-339. 



. (1906). Explanation of the terms used in entomology. 



. (1919). A comparative study of certain sense organs in the antennae and 



palpi of Diptera. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1919, pp. 31-69. 



Snodgrass, R. E. (1902). The inverted hypopygium of DasylHs and Laphria. Psyche, 

 9, pp. 399-400, 1 pi. 



■ . (1903a). The terminal abdominal segments of female Tipulidae. 



Jour. N. Y. Ent. Society, 11. pp. 177-183, 2 pis. 



. (1903b). The tipulid hypopygium. Psyche, 10, pp. 188-189. 



(1904a). The hypopygium of the Tipulidae. Trans. Amer. Ent. 



Soc, 30, pp. 179-236. 



(1904b). The hypopygium of the Dolichopodidae. Proc. Califor- 



nia Acad. Sci., 3, Ser. Ill, pp. 273-295, 4 pis. 



(1909). The thorax of insects and the articulation of the wings. 



Proc U. S. Nat. Museum, 36, pp. 511-595. 



(1922). Mandible substitutes in the Dolichopodidae. Proc. Ent. 



Soc. Washington, 24, pp. 148-152, 1 pi. 



(1928). Morphology and evolution of the insect head and its ap- 



pendages. Smiths. Misc. Collections, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 1-158, 57 figs. 



(1935). Principles of insect morphology. New York, 1935, 667 



pp., 319 figs. 

 Stein, P. (1913). Versuch, die Gattungen u. Arten unserer Anthomyiden nur nach 



dem weiblichen Geschlecht zur bestimmen. Arch. f. Naturg., 8, pp. 4-55. 

 Steinheil, A. P. (1896). Trophi of Tabanus. Stud. Lab. Zool. Univ. Warsaw, 1896, 



pp. 247-250, 2 figs. 

 Stephens, J. W. W. and Newstead, R. (1907). The anatomy of the proboscis of bit- 



mg flies. II. Stomoxys. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol., 1, pp. 171-198, 8 pis. 

 Strauss-Duerkheim, (1828). Considerations generales sur I'anatomie comparee des 



animaux articules. Paris, 1828. 

 Streiff, R. N. (1906). U. das unpaare organ der dipterenfamilie der Conopidae, 



eine anatomisch-physiologische untersuchung u. das abdomen dieser familie. 



Inaug. Diss. Leipzig. 

 Stuhlmann, F. (1907). Beitraege zur Kenntnis der Tsetsefliege, etc. Arbeit. Kais. 



Gesundsheitamte, Berlin, 26, pp. 301-383, 4 pis. 

 Suffolk, W. T. (1869). On the proboscis of the blowfly. Monthly Micr. Jour., 9, 



pp. 331-342, 4 pis. 

 Sulc, K. (1928). Biologische Bedeutimg der Bewaffnung der maennlichen Vorder- 



fusse bei den Sepsiden. Biol. Spisy, Brno, 7, pp. 181-194, 7 figs. 

 Surcouf, J. M. and Gonzales-Rincones, R. (1911). Dipteres vulnerantes de Venezue- 

 la. Paris, 1911, 2 pis. 

 Tetley, H. (1918). The structure of the mouthparts of Pangonia longirostris in re- 

 lation to the probable feeding habits of the species. Bull. Entom. Research, 8, 



pp. 253-268, 1 pi. 



