1. LErCOPEZA. 227 



c. Eictal bristles obsolete or feebly deve- 



loped, so as not to reach beyond the 

 nostrils; bill swollen and not so 

 pointed, in fact g:-eatly curved, and 

 without a notch ; win<^ rounded, the 

 first primary shorter than tlie second, 

 which is shorter than the third, the 

 latter being' tlie longest. 

 e'. BUI about equal in height and breadth 



at nostrils 14. Teretisteis, p. 367. 



/'. Bill higher than broad at nostrils. 

 e". Tail shorter than the wing ; red in 



the plumage 15. Ghanatellus, p. 369. 



/". Tail equal to the wing ; no red in 



the plumage ; breast yellow .... 16. Ictebia, p. 373. 



d. Ivictal bristles very powerfully developed 



and extending beyond the nostrils ; 

 bill very much depressed and Muscica- 

 pine in character. 

 g'. Bill narrower, about equal in breadth 

 and depth at nostrils. 

 (j". Bill rather large, the culmen ex- 

 ceeding the hind toe and claw . . 17. Basileutehus, p. .■i76. 

 h" . Bill very small, the culmen not 



exceeding the hind toe and claw . 18. Ehgaticus, p. 406. 

 h '. Bill rather narrow, deeper at nostrils 



thau it is broad 19. Caedellina, p. 408. 



i. Bill broader, much deeper than it is 

 high at nostrils. 

 i". Wings shorter, falling short of tail 

 by more than the length of the 

 tarsus ; bill widened and de- 

 pressed, with a tolerably sharp 



culminal ridge 20. Setophaga, p. 410. 



k". Wings longer, falling short of the 

 tail by less than the length of the 

 tarsus ; bill narrower, with the 

 culminal ridge rounded 21. Myiodioctes, p. 431. 



1. LEUCOPEZA. 



Type. 

 Leucopeza, Sclafer, P. Z. S. 1876, p. 14 L. semperi. 



Itange. West Indies : islands of Santa Lucia and S. Tinccnt. 



Key to the Species. 



a. No white on the tail-feathers ; no band on the 



breast semperi, p. 228. 



b Two outer tail-feathers with a triangular spot of 

 white at the end of the inner web ; a broad black 

 band on the upper breast * bishopi, p. '228. 



* I have not seen L. bishopi, and therefore have been obliged to draw up the 

 " Key to the Species " from Mr. Lawrence's description of the latter bird, as com- 

 pared with the types of L. semperi. Mr. Lawrence does uot state in wliat way 

 L. bishopi dilTcrs from L. semperi. 



a2 



