48 Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 



In the Census of Victorian Frogs, P.R.S.V., 1891, I included 

 Heleiopoi-its albopunctatus. This was an error. The specimens on 

 which the inclusion was based proved to be very old and large 

 individuals of Limnodynastes dorsnlis. 



I am inclined to suspect that all the smooth Crinias of Victoria 

 and Tasmania are varieties of but one species. 



There does not seem to be in Victoria the marked distinction 

 between the interior and coast forms of Batrachians which Mr. 

 Fletcher has pointed out in the New South Wales species. 

 Certainly the drier conditions of inland New South Wales are 

 much severer than those of inland Victoria. The frogs of 

 Northern Victoria, too, it must be admitted are not sufficiently 

 known. 



The most striking fact brought out by the table is the absence 

 of Heleioporus and Pseudophryne (as far as is known) from 

 Tasmania. 



PISCES. 



