152 A. M. Lea: ColeojJtera, Part I. 



some species of this sub-family, which appeared in the Proceed- 

 ings of the Aust. Assn. for the Advancement of Science. Al- 

 though my paper was "read" in 1902 it was prepared some time 

 before then, and before starting on it I had seen no references 

 to his paper in the Zoological Record. 



For several of the species ^ the locality "Richmond" given 

 by Jacoby is certainly wrong. Richmond is a town on the 

 Hawkesbury River, near Sydney, and I have seen no species of 

 most of the genera referred to so far south. The locality should 

 almost certainly have been Richmond River, where numerous 

 species of the genera referred to are to be obtained. 



Phyllocharis oraciiis, Jac. 

 Redescribed by me as P. fici. 



Stethoniela Joveipenjiis^ Jac. 

 This is a synonym of poroptera, Baly. 



Stethomehi fiilvitarsis^ Jac. 



My cupripes appears to be close to this species, and is per- 

 haps only a variety of it ; it differs from Jacoby's description 

 in having the antennae without the basal joint piceous above ; 

 the tarsi, except the claws, entirely dark, the under surface not 

 piceous, and the upper surface wihout a trace of green. 



RitJuiioudia camelus^ Jac. 



This species was previously described by Blackburn with 

 doubt as a Spilopyra (olliffi, Blackb.). The species must there- 

 fore now be known as Richmondia olliffi, Blackb. 



Ai(i^onie/a i!^?iifa, Jac. 



This is the same sjDccies that I subsequently described under 

 the same name (as supposed by Blackburn), although Jacoby's 

 types were larger than mine. There is therefore no need to 

 change my name as being already in use. 



1 Phi/llorJiaris i^racUis, Chalcoiiida rnriff/tita, Awfomi'la ifinita, Plati/meln black- 

 burni and Itichtnondia camelwi. 



