^;. 21G 



ginning, and who, in the tnumj)h of tlie cause which hnd hnd their 

 pray( IS, went meekly — as woman ever meets a sorrowlul lot — into 

 hopeless, interminable exile. It is to be lamented that better counsels 

 did not prevail. Had New York, Massachusetts, and Virginia espe- 

 cially, been either merciful or just, transactions which, in ages to come, 

 will be very likely to put us on our defence, would not stain our nnnals. 

 The example of South Carolina should have been followed by all. As 

 it was, whigs whose gallantry in the field, whose prudence in the 

 cabinet, and whose exertions in diplomatic stations abroad, had cgn- 

 tributed essentially to the success of the conflict, were regarded with 

 enmity on account of their attempts to produce a better state of feeling 

 and more humane legislation. 



As a matter of expediency, how unwise was it to continue to per- 

 petuate the opponents of the Revolution, and to keep them a distinct 

 class, for a time, and for harm yet unknown! How ill-judged the 

 measures that caused them to settle the hitherto neglected possessions 

 of the British crown! Nova Scotia had been won and lost, and lost 

 and won, in the wars between France and England, and the blood of 

 New England had been poured upon its soil like water; but when we 

 drove thousands and tens of thousands of our countrymen to seek a 

 refage there, what was it? Before the war, the fisheries of its coast — 

 f()r the prosecution of which Halifax its(df was founded — comprised, in 

 public estimation, its chief value ; and though Great Britain had quietly 

 possessed it for about seventy years, the emigration to it of loyalists 

 from the United States, in a single year, more than doubled its popula- 

 tion. By causing the expatriation, then, of the adherents of the British 

 crown, among whom were the well-educated, the ambitious, and the 

 well-versed in politics, we became the Ibunders of two British colonies, 

 for it is to be remembered that New Brunswick formed a part of Nova 

 Scotia until 17S4, and that the necessity of the division then made 

 was of our own creation. In like manner, we became the founders of 

 Upper Canada. The loyalists of our Revolution were the first settlers 

 of the tcrritoiy thus denominated by the act of 1791;* and the princi- 

 pal obje(;t of the line of division of Canada, as established by Mr. Pitt's 

 act, was to place them, as a bod}', by themselves, and to allow them to 

 be governed by laws more congenial than those which were deemed 

 requisite for the subordination of the French on the St. Lawrence. The 

 government for which they had become exiles was liberal to them; it 

 gave tb(>m lands, tools, materials for buildings, and means of subsist- 

 ence for two 3'ears, and to each of their children (at the age of twent}''- 

 one) two hundred acres of land. And besides this, of the offices 

 created by the organization of a new colonial government, they were 

 the cliief recipients. 



Should it be replied that Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Canada 

 West, without accessions from the United States, would have risen to 

 importance ere this, I answer, that there is good reason to doubt it; 



* It wus in a debate on tliiv bill, tliat Fox and Buvke severed the ties of friendsbip which 

 had existed between them for a lonu period. The scene was one of tho most interesting that 

 had e^ver oeciirred in the House of Commons. Fox, overcome by his emotions, wept aloud. 

 Burke's previous course with regard to the French revolutiou had rendered a rupture at 80ia& 

 time probable, perhaps certain. 



