XIV 



THE OOLOGIST 



"THE OOLOGIST is very much im- 

 proved; in no way could I get along 

 without it." 



Edward R. Addams, Dec. 26. 



"Please send me the January num- 

 ber; I can't do without the little 

 OOLOGIST." 



Logan Evans, Jan. 10. 



"Accept my sincere appreciation of 

 the improvements which are evident 

 under the new management." 



Howard N. McMillan, Dec. 30. 



"I have been pleased to note the im- 

 provement in THE OOLOGIST since 

 it came into your hands." 



Dr. F. P. Browne, Jan. 21. 



"THE OOLOGIST is a 'Cracker 

 Jack' as an exchange medium." 



F. T. Corless, Jan. 2. 



"I congratulate you on the improve- 

 ment in the paper." 



John L. Nichols, Dec. 24. 



"Let me congratulate you on the 

 way you have brought THE OOLO- 

 GIST up to its present goodness." 



Earl S. Price, Jan. 6. 



"I have taken THE OOLOGIST 

 since 1893 and would not care to be 

 without it." 



G. F. Dippie, .Jan. 6. 



"I like the magazine very much." 

 Earle Cassidy, Mar. 17 



"Perhaps it will not be out of place 

 here to speak a word of praise. The 

 pictures are fine and add much to the 

 paper. The quality of the paper upon 

 which it is printed is the very best 

 and gives it a fine appearance. Every- 

 thing considered, it is by far the best 

 bird paper published." 



John T. Parsons, Jan. 8. 



"THE OOLOGIST has certainly im- 

 proved since you have taken hold. It 

 is a fine little magazine." 



J. J. Schneider, Jan. 9. 



"The little paper certainly is im- 

 proving; my only fault with it is that 

 it does come oftener and that there is 

 not more of it." 



E. P. Walker, Jan. 24. 



"I want to say I enjoy THE OOLO- 

 GIST about as much as any journal 

 I get. It seems to take me back to 

 those days of keen enjoyment when 

 as a youngster I would ramble over 

 field, and through the woods without 

 the present day too much scramble for 

 the almighty. A little more of this 

 today would do away with many of 

 our patent medicine houses and would 

 give us the health we desire. 



Dr. E. S. Schmidt, Feb. 2. 



"Please accept my congratulations 

 upon the improved appearance of the 

 magazine." 



W. Leon Dawson, Feb. 17. 



"You are making THE OOLOGIST 

 a fine paper. I have taken it for 24 

 years and it has always been worth 

 .50c. Enough said." 



J. W. Sugden, Feb. 20. 



"THE OOLOGIST is getting better 

 every month and is sure worth dou- 

 ble the price." 



M. A. White, Feb. 16th. 



"THE OOLOGIST is better than I 

 have ever seen it before, and hope it 

 will continue to be as good if not bet- 

 ter than it is now." 



S. S. S. Stansell, Mar. 3. 



"THE OOLOGIST looks much bet- 

 ter than it ever has since I became 

 a subscriber about ten years ago; I 

 wish von all kinds of success and good 

 luck." 



Stanley Y. Jewett, Feb. 28. 



