yo Records of the Indian Museum. [Vol. XVII, 



pelargus, id., loc. cit., IX, 143, o" 9 , pi. xii, 16, last 2 joints 9 

 antenna (1913). 



Calcutta, 29-viii-07, type, o" , ii-xii-07, type 2. Types in 

 Indian Museum, the only specimens. 



ditaenius, id., loc. cit., 144, 9 (1913). 



Katihar, r4-x-07 [Paiva]. The unique type in the Indian 

 Museum is a useless fragment. 



caunteri, id., loc. cit., 144, 9 (1913). 



Rajmahal, Bengal, 5-vii, at light [.Annandale}; on board 

 launch at light, Borondhur, Khulna Distr., Ganges Delta, 29-viii 

 [Jenkins}; Chennia, 24 Perghs., Sunderbunds, lo-xi [/ewA'JMs] ; 

 Balighai, near Puri, 23-x [Annandale']. Paratypes in Indian 

 Museum. 



dolens, id., Mem. Ind. Mus. II, 233, 9 (Prochironomus) (1910). 

 /(/., Rec. Ind. Mus. IX, 145, cf 9 , pi. xii, 17, genitalia tip 



(1913)- 

 Calcutta, ii, viii, xi, xii; at light, i; Bettiah, Bengal, iii ; 

 Katihar, x {Paiva} ; Sonapur, Bengal, 24-xii, at light in railway- 

 carriage [.Annandale}; Puri, 2-iii [Paiva}. Several paratypes 

 in Indian i\Iuseum. 



A variety from the base of the Dawna Hills, taken in March 

 by Dr. Annandale, noted by Kieffer (Mem. Ind. Mus. II, 234). 



Glyptotendipcs, Kieff.' 



Genotype, G. sigillatus Kieff. , by original desig- 

 nation. 



verrucosus Kieff., Rec. Ind. Mus. VI, <:#• 9 (Chirononius) (1911). 

 Id., loc. cit., IX, 140, note, pi. xi, ir, genitalia tip (Tendipes). 

 Bhim Tal, 25, 27-ix-o6 [Annandale]; Calcutta, 26-v ; 14-vii ; 

 28-xii-07. Paratype.s in Indian Museum. 



Prochironomus, Kieff.* 



Mem. Ind. Mus. II, 225 (1910). 

 Genotype unknown to present author. 



prussicus Kieff., Mem. Ind. Mus. II, 229,a'(i9io). 



Simla, i2-\--oS[. Annandale}. Ty^^, a much damaged unique 

 specimen, in Indian Museum. 



pictiventris, id., loc. cit., 229, c^ (1910). 



Bettiah, Champaran, Bengal, 4-iii-o8. Type, a unique speci- 

 men, in Indian Museum. 



' The orijjinal descripiion of this genus is unknown 10 me. 



' .-Mthough Kieffer removes three species, sfriatipennis, ptincfatipeiinis and 

 fasciatipennis, to Chironomus. he says nothing about the remainder from which I 

 infer he still considers Prochironomus a valid genus. 



