248 Records of the Indian Museum. [Vol. XVII, 



Conosia, Wulp. 



Tijd. V. Ent. XXIII. 159, pi. x, 5—7 (1880). 

 Ost. vSack., Berl. Ent. Zeits. XXXI, 206: 

 Brun., Fauna Brit. Ind., 496. 

 Genotype, Limnohia irrorata W., by original 

 designation. 



irrorata Wied., Auss. Zweifl. I, 574, 9 {Limnohia) (1828). 



Auctt. var.; Brun., Rec. Ind. Mus. VI, 283: Fauna Brit. Ind. 



497, cr- S , fig. 43, lateral view, pi. x, 5, wing. 

 Limnobia substituta Walk., List Dipt. Brit. Mus. I, 39 (1848). 

 Limnophila crux Del., Nat. Tijd. Ned. Ind. XIV, 388, pi. iv, 3, 



full insect (1857). 



Apparently distributed generalh- throughout the Orient, com- 

 mon in many places, and extending from Peshawar District 

 [Fletcher] to Assam, Cochin, Java, Formosa, Sumatra, China, 

 Japan and Australia. Dr. Annandale took it at Lake Tiberias 

 in Palestine. 



Type presumably in Westemanns' coll. at Vienna Museum. 



Cladura, Ost. Sack. 



Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad. p. 229 (1859). 



Ost. Sack., Monog. Dipt. N. Amer. IV, 187: 

 Berl. Ent. Zeits. XXXI, 205 : Brun., Rec. Ind. 

 Mus. VI, 283 (the Cladura group); XV, 319: 

 Fauna Brit. Ind., 499. 



Ge.notype, C. fltxvoferruginea Ost. vSack., by 

 original designation. 



flavescens Brun., Rec. Ind. Mus. VI, 284, cf 9 (1911).' 



Id., Fauna Brit. Ind., 501, a* 9 , pi. x, 6, wing: Rec. Ind. 

 Mus. XV, 319 (retention of species in Cladura). 

 Darjiling, 7-viii-09, type ty ; 6-viii-09, type 9 [both Paiva]. 

 Types, a unique pair, in Indian Museum. 



intcrrupta Brun., Rec. Ind. Mus., XV, 319, $ (1918). 



Pashok, Darjiling Distr. , 3500 ft., 26 v — i4-vii6 [Gravely]. 

 Type in Indian Museum. 



Paracladura, Brun. 



Rec. Ind. Mus. VI, 286 (1911). 

 Id., Fauna Brit. Ind., 502: id., Rec. Ind. Mus. 

 XV, 320 (position criticised). 

 Genotype, /'. gracilis Brun., by original desig- 

 nation. 



' C. fla'vescens is almost certainly a Cladura in Osten Sacken's sense, agreeing 

 with his description and with .Needham's figure. I think .\lexander is in error in 

 claiming that my species is wrongly placed gcneric.illy. 



^ For discussion on .-Vluxander's objection to this genus, v. Bnin., Rec. Ind. 

 Mus. .W, 320. 



