M. H. CraiNK 11 



PLATE VI. 



Fig. 14. Shows an intloiesepuce of our; of tlio ijlants wliich occurred in tlie Fj funiily witb 



contabescent stamens. 

 Fig. 15. Fruits of family j'J. Nos. 4, !> an.l 10 are the |iyriform Ioiiks, tlie otliers are 



full longs. 

 Fig. 16. Fruits of family ^"f. Nos. 5, 12, 14 anil K! are tlie calaliasU tyjie, tlie remaimler 



pyriforin. 

 Fig. 17. The imliviiUuil fruit ^^\ '■' is the constricted round type. 



PLATE VII. 



Fig. 18. Showing the fruits of family J j ; the rounds are not separated from the conicals. 



Nos. 4, 17, 24, 31, 32 and 34 are probably genetically rounds. Nos. 28, 38 and 39 are 



the compressed rounds, and the bottom two rows are the longs. 

 Fig. 19. Family ,\ is similar to | ; . No. 5 is the compressed round, and Nos. 1, 7, 12 



and 1.5 are longs. 

 I'j is a family from a full long parent, and family (\ is apparently homozygous for 



conical fruit shape. 



The numbers of the fruits in the illustrations were the numbers of the individuals 

 in the families from which they came. In all cases the fruit illustrated is a typical 

 representative. 



LITERATURE. 



(1) Dahwin. T/ii; Variation of Aiu'iiKils and I'lants under Domestication. Vol. ii. 



1890, p. 149. 



Forms of Floirers. 1884, p. 28.3. 



(2) Price, H. L. .uhI Drinkard, A. W. "Inheritance in Tomato Hybrids." 



Virginia At/ric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 177, 1908, p. 28. 



(3) Salaman, R. N. " The Heredity Characters in the Potato." ■ Journ. Roy. 



Hort. Soc. Vol. xxxvill. Part 1, 1912, p. :ir^. 



(4) "The Inheritance of Colour and other (!liaracters in the Potato." 



Journal of Genetics, Vol. i. No. 1, 1910, p. 10. 



