126 Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 



1828. Trochus badius, Wood. Index. Test., sup., pi. 6, f. 



46. 

 1834. Trochus australis, Quoy and Gaimard. Astrolabe, 



vol. iii., p. 248, pi. 63, £. 13, 14. 

 1841. Monodonta rosea, Delessert. Recueil, No. 22, pi. 



37, f. 3(7, b, c. 

 1841. Monodonta lineata, Delessert. Id., No. 23, pi. 37, 



f. ia, h. 

 1846. Troclius roseus, Philippi. Conch. Cab., p. 134, 



No. 156, pi. 23, f. 7. 

 1846. Trochus peronii, Philippi. Id., p. 135, No. 158, 



pi. 23, f. 9. 

 1846. Trochus quoyi, Philippi. Id., p. 139, No. 165, pi. 



23, f. 17. 

 1846. Trochus badius, Philippi. Id., p. 137, No. 162, 



pi. 23, f. 14. 

 1859. Elenchus fulmineus, Chenu. Man. de Conch., vol. i., 



p. 360, f. 2671. 

 1889. Cantharidus (Phasianotrochus) badius, Tryon. 

 Man. Conch., vol. xi., p. 131, pi. 45, f. 57, 58. 

 1889. Cantharidus (Phasianotrochus) peroni, Tryon. 

 Id., p. 132, pi. 34, £. 12-14. 

 Hab. — Western Port ; Anderson's Inlet ; Puebla Coast ; 

 Warrnambool ; Port Fairy. 



Obs. — While looking into the synonymy of this species, it 

 seems pretty obvious that rosea should be accepted in preference 

 to lineata. Mr. C. Hedley has kindly drawn our attention to a 

 recent note by Mr. Pilsbry in the " Nautilus" for May 1901, in 

 which he states that he believes it has not been noticed that 

 Bulinius eximius. Perry, Conchology, plate 30, figure 2 (1811), is 

 identical with Cantharidus badius. Wood ; and Bulimus 

 carinatus, Perry, f. 1, is C. peronii, Philippi. We have not yet 

 had an opportunity of seeing Perry's work, and are therefore 

 unable to express an opinion on the matter, except that carinatus 

 is the name that should stand for this species if Pilsbry be correct. 



Phasianotrochus irisodontes, Quoy and Gaimard. 



1834. Trochus irisodontes, Quoy and Gaimard. Astro- 

 labe, vol. iii., p. 246, pi. 63, f. 7-12. 



