GRAGG. — THE GREEK EPIGRAM BEFORE 300 B. C. 49 



94. AP 7. 249 (= Sim. 92 = Pr 21 : Hdt. 7. 228). 



95. AP 7. 677 (= Sim. 94 = Pr 20 : Hdt. 7. 228). 



96. AP 7. 248 (= Sim. 91 = Pr 200 : Hdt. 7. 228). 



97. PLG Sim. 93 (= Pr 22). 



98. Pr 23 (PLG 3, p. 428). 



99. AP 7. 250 (= Sim. 97 = Pr 5). "3 



100. AP 7. 347 (= Sim. 98 = Pr 4). 



101. PLG Sim. 89 (= A PI 26). "4 



102. AP 7. 512 (= Sim. 102). 



103. AP 7. 251 (= Sim. 99)."« 



104. AP 7. 255 (= PLG Aesch. 3). "6 



105. AP 7. 508 (= PLG 2. p. 260 = Pr 40). 



106. AP 7. 253 (= Sim. 100 = Pr 8). 



107. PLG Sim. Ill (= Pr 31 : Thuc. 6. 59). 



108. PLG Aesch. 4 (= Pr 39). 



109. AP 7. 258 (= Sim. 105). "7 



110. AP7. 509 (=Sim. 118). 



111. AP 7. 507b {= Sim. 124 B). 



112. PLG Sim. 130 (= Pr 51). 



113. AP 7. 270 (= Sim. 109). 



114. PLG Eurip. 1 (= Pr 9). 



115. Pr 41 (PLG 3, p. 517 : Plut. Mor. 217 F). 



116. AP 10. 105 (= Sim. 122). 



117. CIA I, 374 (= K 752). 



118. CIA I, 418 (= K 763). Restored by Kaibel. 



119. CIA I, 382 (=K754). 



120. CIA I, 353 (= K 765). 



121. CIA I, 397 (= K 753). 



122. CIA I, 349 (= K 756 = H 236). 



*123. CIA I, 403 (= K 751 = AP 13. 13). Restored by Meineke. 

 *124. CIA I, 381 (= K 758 = Anac. 104 = AP 6. 138). 



173 Yv. 1 and 2 form a complete epigram (see Kaibel, RM 28. 444), and vv. 3-6 

 are not quoted by any author before Aristides. This makes it probable that 3-6 are 

 a later addition (see Wilhelm, JOAI 2, p. 244, and Wilariiowitz, Goett. Nadir., 1897, 

 p. 308). Kaibel (1. c.) says of vv. 1 and 2 : "Nihil habet quod reprehendas prae- 

 terquam quod nee mortuos homines neque hostes devictos quinam fuerint significat ; 

 unde antique sepulcro insculptum fuisse nequit." But cf. 81. See also p. 24, 

 n. 94. 



"* Wilhelm (1. c.) thinks vv. 3, 4 a later addition. 



"» Cf. AP 7. 242. With v. 2 cf. Sim. 87. 8 and Iliad U. 66. 



"* Evidently an imitation of 103. It is very likely epideictic. The Kai looks 

 like an imitation of an epigram like 171 b, where the Kal is in place, as it is not here. 



^'^ Wilhelm (1. c.) thinks only vv. 1, 2 are original. Cf. note on 101. 

 VOL. XLVl. — 4 



