920 



REPORT OF NATIONAL MUSEUM, 1X97. 



Fig. 155. 



STEMMED AHKOW- 

 POINT OF YELLOW- 

 ISH-BROW.V .lASPEH, 

 SHOULDERED liVT 

 NOT liAUBED. 



Siisquehauna River. 



I'eunsylvania. 



Division III, Class B. 



2ixJxJ. 



Cat. No. 34.HS1, U.S.N. M. 



Fig. 156. 



STEMMED All ROW- 

 POINT OK VELLOW- 

 ISH-ORAY FLINT. 

 SHOULDERED BUT 

 NOT BARBED. 



Brownsville, Licking 



County, Ohio. 



DivisiouIII, Class B. 



lixlxg. 



C.it. No. li4S7, U.S.N.M. 



Fig. IT),") is similar to fig. 151, Just described. Tliongli widely sep 

 arated by distance, the former coming from Tennessee, the latter from 

 Pennsy]vania,tlieyliave great resemblance. Both are 

 of jasi)er, with api)arently the same style of workmau- 

 sbip. The base, stem, and shoulders 

 of the latter are iiiiich the same as 

 the former, excei)t that they are ac- 

 centuated. The stem is narrower, 

 its lines more concave or slightly 

 more expanding toward the base, 

 where they form corners of an acule 

 angle. The base is slightly concave 

 where the other is straigjit. The 

 implement is the same length as fig. 

 lal, though narrower ami thinner. 

 Fig. 3 50 is from Ohio. It, like 

 the former specimen, is fairly well 

 chi])ped, flakes i>lainly to be seen, 

 and the edges and i)oint compara- 

 tively smooth and sharp. The stem 

 is straight, its edges parallel, and the 

 base straight and square. The shoulders are formed 

 after the same manner as fig. 151, preceding, and simply swell out so as 

 to make a more pronounced shoulder than in that specimen. The edges 

 are convex and coming together form the i)oint. 



Figs. 157 and 158, the former from Tennessee, the 

 latter from Massachusetts, are almost identical in form. 

 The former is of gray, the latter of black flint. With 

 exceptions of material, color, and size, they are the 

 same. If they were to be compared 

 by form only, scarcely anyone would 

 be able to detect a difference between 

 them. Their edges are straight and 

 come directly to a point. Their shoul- 

 ders are horizoiial, not barbed; the 

 notch Avhich forms the stem is con- 

 cave and carried to the base of the 

 stem; the base is square and dressed 

 to a smooth edge so that it can be 

 inserted in a si)lit arrow shaft, while 

 the notches on either side aflord excellent supports 

 for attachment by ligatures. 



Fig. 159 has a stem similar to figs. 157 and 158. The 

 notch which forms it is concave, extending from shoul- 

 der to base and making an expanding stem with convex base. The edges 

 are convex and, converging symmetrically, ibrm a medium sharp point. 



Fig. 157. 



STEMMED ARKOW- 

 POINT, SHOULDERED 

 BUT NOT BARBED. 



Lincoln County, Ten- 

 nessee. 

 Division III, (Jlass 15. 

 2JxlxJ. 



Cat. No. 6112:!, U.S.N. AL 



Fig. iryS 

 STE.MMED ARROW- 

 POINT, .SHOULDERED 

 BUT NOT BARBED. 

 South Dennis, Barn- 

 stable County, 

 Massachusetts. 

 Division III, Class B. 

 lixjxj. 



C.it. No. I80,V., U.S.N.M. 



