NO. 6 INSECT ABDOMEN — SNODGRASS 125 



(1919). The genitalia and terminal abdominal structures of males, and 



the terminal structures of the larvae of " chalastogastrous " Hymenoptera. 



Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 21: 129-151, pis. 9-12. 

 • • (1920). Remarks on the basic plan of the terminal abdominal struc- 

 tures of the males of winged insects. Canad. Ent. 52: 178-183, pi. 6. 

 ■ (1921). A comparison of the terminal abdominal structures of insects 



and Crustacea. Ent. Ncivs 32 : 257-264, pi. 5. 

 DiRKES, L. (1928). Das larvale Muskelsystem und die Entwicklung der imagi- 



nalen Flugmuskulatur von Psychoda alternata Say. Zeitschr. Morph. 



Okol. Ticrc II : 182-228, 14 text figs. 

 Du Porte, E. M. (1920). The muscular system of Gryllus assimilis Fabr. Ann. 



Ent. Soc. America 13: 16-52, pis. 1-7. 

 DiJRKEN, B. (1907). Die Tracheenkiemenmuskulatur der Ephemeriden unter 



Beriicksichtigimg der Morphologic des Insektenfliigels. Zeitschr. zviss. Zool. 



87:435-550, 29 text figs., pis. 24-26. 

 Eastham, L. E. S. (1930). The embryology of Pieris rapae. — Organogeny. 



Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lojidon, ser. B, 219: 1-50, pis. 1-9. 

 Ferris, G. F., and Chemberlin, J. C. (1928). On the use of the word " chitin- 



ized." Ent. Neivs 39:212-215. 

 Floren'CE, Laura (1921). The hog louse, Haematopinus suis Linne: its biology, 



anatomy, and histology. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta., Memoir 51:641- 



725, pis. 58-66. 

 Forbes, W. T. M. (1914). A structural study of the caterpillars: III, the 



somatic muscles. Ann. Ent. Soc. America 7: 109-124, pis. 17-25. 



(1916). On certain caterpillar homologies. Jonrn. Neiv York Ent. Soc. 



24: 137-142, I fig. 



Ford, Norma (1923). A comparative study of the abdominal musculature of 

 orthopteroid insects. Tra)is. Roy. Canadian Institute 14:207-319, pis. 7-23. 



Fracker, S. B. (1915). The classification of lepidopterous larvae. Illinois Biol. 

 Monographs 2, No. i, 169 pp., 10 pis. 



Grassi, B. (1887). Anatomia comparata dei Tisanuri e considerazioni generali 

 suir organizzazione degli insetti. Atti de' Lined, Mem. CI. Sci. Fis., Ser. 4, 

 4 : 543-606, 5 pis. 



Haase, E. (1889). Die Abdominalanhange der Insekten mit Beriicksichtigung 

 der Myriopoden. Morphol. Jahrh. 15:331-435, pis. 14, 15. 



Hansen, H. J. (1930). Studies on Arthropoda. III. On the comparative mor- 

 phology of the appendages in the Arthropoda, 376 pp., 16 pis. Copenhagen. 



Hewitt, C. G. (1914). The house fly, Musca domestica Linn., 382 pp., 104 figs. 

 Cambridge Zoological Series. 



Hevmons, R. (1892). Die Entwicklung der weiblichen Geschlechtsorgane von 

 Phyllodromia (Blatta) germanica L. Zeitschr. zviss. Zool. 53:434-536, 

 pis. 18-20. 



(1895). Die Segmentirung des Insektenkorpers. Abhandl. Akad. Wiss. 



Berlin 1895, 39 pp., i pi. 



(1896). Uber die Lebensweise und Entwicklung von Ephemera vul- 



gata L. Sitzungs-Ber. Gesell. Natiirf. Fr. Berlin 1896:82-96. 



(1896 a). Zur Morphologie der Abdominalanhange bei den Insekten. 



Morph. Jahrh. 24: 178-204, pi. i. 



(1896b). Uber die abdominalen Korperanhange der Insekten. Biol. 



Centralb. 16:854-864. 



