188 



• I lu^^■e indieated them foi- refcrencc by thc iiunibers in 

 the eollection, under wliich thcy were sent to me by Herr 

 H. Dohrn. 



286. Pseudotritoma chrysospila Ciotch, Rev. Erotyl. p. 469 

 (Tritotnideä). 



Hab. Soekaranda. 



I examined the type in thc Cambridge Museum; it is not 

 al all like Motschoulsky's genus, and from memory the present 

 insect must be the same or very close to it. 



287. Pseudotritoma nigrocruciata? Crotch, bc. cit. (Tri- 

 tomideci). 



Hab. Liangagas. 



The example whieh I think is probably a representive of 

 Croteh's Tritomidea mgrocritciata. agrees with bis description, 

 but I think they represent but one speeies. There being only 

 one specimen of eaeh, it is clearly impossible to arrive at any 

 certain conclusion. 



315. Pseudotritoma sp.? 

 Hab. Liangagas. 



ClearJy distinct from, but very hke C. chrysospila. The 



])unctuation is exeeedingl}' close and fine, but the eljtra have 



a number of large scattered punctures on the black median fascia. 

 One specimen. 



316. Pseudotritoma sp.? 

 Hab. Soekaranda. 



Larger and differently punctured from C chrysospila. with 

 the head and body blackish, the abdomen pitchy. One example. 



Cyrtotriplax (Crutch) Gorham, Ann. Mus. Civ. Gen. 1896. 

 p. 286. 



1 propose to retain this name for numerous speeies from 

 the East, M-bich are not Tritomas nor Triplaces in the accepted 

 sense of those palaearctic genera (see Biologia Cent. Am. Vol. \ll. 



Stett. cntomol. Zoit. 1901. 



