214 



THE OOLOGIST 



January 5, 1915. 

 "I always sit down and read the 

 Oologist through as soon as it conies." 

 S. M. Burdick. 

 January 11, 1915. 

 "The last number contains illus- 

 trations which alone are worth the 

 cost of that number." 



John T. Parsons. 

 January 12, 1915. 

 "I have had nine or ten answers 

 to my maga2;ine advertisement in the 

 Oologist, and would be glad to have 

 you say for me how well it pays to 

 advertise in that publication." 



Lillian L. Beers. 

 January 17, 1915. 

 "You are giving us a mighty good 

 paper for the money." 



W. P. Nicholson. 

 Feb. 1st, 1915. 

 "A fine little paper and the cause 

 of me becoming acquainted with some 

 good fellows." E. A. Sikken. 



January 17, 1915. 

 "The Journal is worth $1.00 and I 

 should think many would be willing 

 to pay that for it." 



S. S. Dickey. 

 January 18, 1915. 

 "The 1914 Oologist was a dandy 

 and I trust that 1915 will be as good." 

 Alex Walker. 

 January 24, 1915. 

 "I actually can't see how you get 

 out such a high grade paper for such 

 a small amount charged for subscrip- 

 tions." F. T. Carless. 

 January 25, 1915. 

 "I certainly have enjoyed and 

 profited by the reading of your mag- 

 azine." Robert S. Bains. 

 January 27, 1915. 

 "I do not wish to miss a single 

 number." Ernest S. Norman. 

 January 29, 1915. 

 "You have a live little paper and 

 we certainly get our money's worth." 

 Fred J. Dixon. 

 January, 1915. 

 "Your January number is a good 

 one and very interesting." 



Alfred L. Marshall. 

 February 1, 1915. 

 "I congratulate you upon the last 

 number of the Oologist. It was the 

 finest yet." 



D. I. Shepardson. 



Feb. 1, 1915. 

 "This is the best egg magazine 

 that is published." 



C'aspar G. Burn. 

 "It is alright. We get full worth 

 of our money." F. T. Pember. 



Feb. 6, 1915. 

 "If your paper continues to im- 

 improve in 1915 as it has been in the 

 past, you'll be charging us more than 

 fifty cents per annum. Well, we 

 should worry." J. R. McLeod. 



Feb. 17, 1915. 

 "I must say that the last few num- 

 bers were simply great and that it is 

 growing better every month." 



E. A. Stoner. 



July 10, 1915. 

 "It seems to me that the Oologist 

 is getting better all the time." 



Fred Maltby. 

 July 17, 1915. 

 "A nature lover can't help but like 

 the Oologist and we know that the 

 Editor's heart and soul is in it which 

 makes it better." 



George L. Cook. 

 August 16, 1915. 

 "I always look forward to the com- 

 ing of this little bird publication. It 

 has them all beat a mile." 



C. G. Hart. 

 Aug. 21, 1915. 

 "I would rather do without my eats 

 than the Oologist." 



Turner E. McMuUen. 

 Aug. 26, 1915. 

 "Permit me to say at this time, I 

 have thoroughly enjoyed each and 

 every copy of your magazine, and 

 always look forward to dates of is- 

 sue." J. H. Trumbull. 

 Aug. 28, 1915. 

 "I can't get along without the 

 Oologist." R. Spellum. 

 Aug. 30, 1915. 

 "My friends, Mr. Horace Green, 

 and Mr. Donald Nicholson together 

 with myself think the price of the 

 Oologist ought to be $1.00 a year. 

 How many others, we would like to 

 ask feel the same way." 



Edw. S. Coombs. 

 Oct. 22, 1915. 

 "It is one of the best bird publica- 

 tions in the United States. It is 

 'alive' with valuable information." 

 Alfred Cookman. 



