THE OOLOGIST 



This is what the Bird IVlen Think of 

 The Oologist. 



"You certainly are getting out a 

 dandy magazine now; it seems to get 

 better witli each number." — ^F. T. Cor- 

 less, Jan. 24, 1913. 



■'I can't afford to miss a single is- 

 sue." — Ralph W. Jackson, Jan. 21, 

 1913. 



"Let me have January number if it 

 is out as I sure miss not getting it on 

 time. Look for it with more eagerness 

 than all the rest of the Journals put 

 together." — Oscar E. Baynard, January 

 24, 1913. 



"All success to The Oologist and my 

 heartiest congratulations for the splen- 

 did improvement the paper has made 

 under your guidance." — Richard C. 

 Harlow, Jan. 24, 1913. 



"I have secured you a new subscrib- 

 er to the best bird magazine in the 

 country."F. R. Decker, Jan. 21, 1913. 



"I have been a subscriber to The 

 Oologist for only one year, and I wish 

 I had begun my subscription years 

 ago, as it is without doubt the best lit- 

 tle publication I have ever seen." — J. 

 R. McLeod, Jan. 13, 1913. 



"I don't want to miss a copy. I 

 think it a wonderful little magazine 

 and enjoy every word of it; have maoo 

 many friends through the ads." — Rjs- 

 coe I. Giles, Jan., 23. 



"Its descriptions are truer to life of 

 western birds than any other publica- 



tion that we get." — Wm. S. Van Voris, 

 Jan. 28. 



"I enjoy this magazine and do not 

 want to miss any of .the numbers." — 

 G. E. Osterhout, Jan. 23. 



"I am well pleased with the maga- 

 zine in every way, and wish you in- 

 creasing success." — James A. Doh- 

 back, Feb. 10. 



"I have been a subscriber to The 

 Oologist for two years and think it a 

 very fine publication. In fact it is the 

 only thing of its kind that I have erer 

 seen." — Alan S. Armstrong, Feb. 15. 



As I have often said before and now 

 repeat, your medium is the best adver- 

 tising and instructive periodical that 

 appears on my desk each month and 

 I look forward to the fifteenth of each 

 month for its coming, as there is al- 

 ways something bright and breezy and 

 up to the minute in its pages which is 

 v.orth many times the price of a year's 

 subscription. — Louis S. Kohler, Dec. 

 13, 1913. 



I have enclosed the fifty cents of my 

 subscription to the "Oologist" for 1914. 

 I would be lost without the magazine 

 new.— Miller T. Mercer, Dec. 21, 1913. 



I desire to compliment you upon the 

 excellence of the publication. — Dr. 

 Joseph Ball, Dec. 22, 1913. 



We think a great deal of the Oolo- 

 gist and are always looking for the 

 next issue. — Cecil Brown, Dec. 24, 

 1913. 



