THE OOLOGIST 



I am more than pleased with your 

 paper. — Ralph W. Jackson, Dec. 27, 

 1913. 



I think it is a very fine magazine 

 and I am always glad when it comes — 

 Frank Esplan, Jan. 27, 1914. 



I must say your magazine is very 

 good and I enjoy the reading very 

 much. — Alfred L. Marshall, Dec. 30, 

 1913. 



Wishing you a Happy New Year and 

 many, many years for the only bird 

 egg medium of exchange. — Rolla F. 

 Lozier, Jan. 1, 1914. 



The whole year's issue is such an 

 improvement over the old issues, I can 

 not help but compliment you on it and 

 trust the following year is as success- 

 ful.— H. H. Bailey, Jan. 1, 1914. 



Glad to note our little paper is gain- 

 ing.— W. G. Savage, Jan. 2, 1914. 



The Oologist improves every year. — 

 E. J. Wheeler, Jan. 7, 1914. 



I want the Oologist all the time. — 

 Wilson Tout, Jan. 14, 1914. 



Have taken it so long would be lost 

 without it. — F. A. W. Dean, Jan. 14, 

 1914. 



I certainly think the magazine has 

 Improved a lot. — Norman Haultain, 

 Jan. 16, 1914. 



Your paper is a "Jim Dandy" and I 

 would not be without it for three times 

 its price. — Carl F. Wright, Jan. 20, 

 1914. 



Your little paper is very interesting 

 and a welcome visitor each month. — 

 Albert J. Richards, Jan. 21, 1914. 



I wish you a very prosperous New 

 Year and increased circulation to your 

 magazine which is constantly improv- 

 ing.— Fred'k J. Dixon, Jan. 28, 1914. 



Kindly cut my "Ad" out of the Oolo- 

 gist. I secured the skins within ten 

 days after the January issue came to 



hand. — .John G. Tyler. 



I think the Oologist has improved 

 much lately and you deserve lots of 

 credit for your hard work. — Joseph 

 Parker Nonis, Jr., Feb. 8, 1914. 



I like the Oologist very much. — 

 .Tames O. Johnson, Feb. 8, 1914. 



We cannot be without this publica- 

 tion. — Pahrman Bros., Feb. 9, 1914. 



I have been getting this Bird Maga- 

 zine for nearly 25 years and must say 

 that I have enjoyed every number re- 

 ceived in all those years. I think the 

 Oologist is better now than it has 

 been in several years. All bird lovers 

 should receive it. — L. Ernest Morceau, 

 Feb. 22, 1914. 



The Oologist is the paper for me and 

 is as good as the best of them. — H. F. 

 Duprey. 



Let me congratulate you in regard 

 to the little publication, it is certainly 

 a world advertiser. — Franklin J. 

 Smith, Mar. 14, 1914. 



