1907.] 201 



than tlie 3rd and 4tli together, the 3rd about two-fifths or nearly one-third shorter 

 than the 2nd, the 4th one-third tiie length of the 3rd, and the Ist joint of the tarsi 

 slightly shorter than the 2nd and 3rd together. 



Cnlocoris striatellus, F. = C. ochromelas, Gmcl. 

 „ chenopodii, Fall. = C. Uneolatus, Goeze. 



„ marginellus, F. = C. M.fiavum, Goeze. 



Oncognathus^ Fieb. ^ Stenotun, Jak. 



Zygimus, 8aund. = Camptozygum, Eeut. 



Poeciloscgfus vulnerafus, Wolff. (Ent. Mo. Ma^., xxxiv, p. 15). 



First recorded by Mr. Thouless from Yarmouth in 1S97, where he 

 took a few specimeiia on the sandhills on Galium verum in September. 

 It is very distinct from P. iinifasciatus, being considerably smaller, paler, and 

 greenish-grey, the pronotum with a few darker markings, and the elytra nearly 

 unicolorous, with a bright red spot and a black line on the outer margin of the 

 otherwise white cuneus. 



Capsus laniarius^ L. = C. ruber, L. 



Globiceps cruciatus, Rent. = G. Jiavomaculatus, F. 



,, Jiavomaculatus, Rent, and Saund. = selecius, D. and S. 



Mncrocoleus, Fieb. = Megalocoleus, Eeut. 

 Psallus sanguineus, F. = P. roseus, F. 

 Flagiogtiathufi viridulus, Fall. = P. chri/santhemi, Wolff. 



„ {Agalliasfes) evanescens, Boh. (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxx, 



p. 254). 

 The late Mr. A. Beaumont first called attention to this species ; 

 he took a few specimens amongst Sedum at Colwyn Bay in August, 

 1890. 



It is quite distinct from our other species in its uniform brown colour; it 

 somewhat resembles /'. wilkinsoni, but it differs from that in being r.ither broader, 

 by its duller surface, tin; coarser, yellowish-white pubescence and the black antennae ; 

 from saUitans its pubescence and dull surface, its unspotted elytra, and longer 3rd 

 and 4th joints of the antenuco will distinguish it at once. 



CORIXINA. 



Corixa atomaria, Fieb. = G. affinis, Leach. 



„ seJecta, Fieb. (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxx, p. 101). 



Mr. Jas. Edw.irds introduced this species on specimens from 

 coast marshes in Norfolk ; it is very distinct structurally, but pro- 

 bably overlooked on account of its close general resemblance to 

 lugubris. 



$ . Differs from that of luguhris in having a strong transverse keel across the 

 forehead, situated considerably above the lower margin of the eyes, with a well 

 defined deep transverse impression above it, which emphasizes the keel ; the entire 



