278 Journal of Agricultural Research voi. xvi. no. 10 



(5) Alway, Frederick J., McDolE, G. R., and Trumbull, R. S. 



1918. INTERPRETATION OF FIELD OBSERVATIONS ON THE MOISTNESS OF THE 



SUBSOIL. In Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron., v. 10, no. 7/8, p. 265-278. 

 Literatiire cited, p. 278. 

 (6) and Trumbull, R. S. 



1910. A contribution TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE NITROGEN PROBLEM UNDER 



DRY FARMING. In Jour. Indus. and Engin, Chem., v. 2, no. 4, p. 

 135-138. 

 (7) Briggs, Lyman J. 



191 5. DRY-FARMING INVESTIGATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES. In Rpt. 84th 



Meeting Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 1914, p. 263-282, 7 fig., pi. 5. 

 (8) and Shantz, H. L. 



1912. THE WILTING COEFFICIENT FOR DIFFERENT PLANTS AND ITS INDIRECT 



DETERMINATION. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Plant Indus. Bui. 230, 83 

 p., 9 fig., 2 pi. 

 (9) Dyer, Bernard. 



1902. RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS ON THE ROTHAMSTED SOILS . . . U. S. 



Dept. Agr. Office Exp. Sta. Bui. 106, 180 p. 



(10) Smith, William G., and Kirk, N. M. 



1916. SOIL SURVEY OF RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA. U. S. Dept. AgT. Bur. 



Soils, Adv. Sheets — Field Oper., 1914, 37 p., 2 fig., map. 



(11) Snyder, Harry. 



1897. EFFECTS OF THE ROTATION OF CROPS UTON THE HUMUS CONTENT AND THE 



FERTILITY OF SOILS. In Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 53, p. 1-12. 



(12) Thorne, Chas. E. 



19 18. THE FUNCTION OF ORGANIC MATTER IN THE MAINTENANCE OF SOIL FERTIL- 

 ITY. In Amer. Fert., v. 48, no. 4, p. 26-27. 



