'y^):t [November, 



Arjromyza capitata, Zett. — Fii'st recorded from Keninare, l>y Col. Yerbvuy, 

 in the " Irish Naturalist " for 1902, Ijiit is not uncommon in England. 



*Agromijza carhonaria, Zett. — Specimens of what I take to be this species 

 were caught by Col. Yerbnry at Dartford (Kent) in 19()8. 



*Agromyza laterella, Zett.— Not at all an uncommon, but somewhat variable, 

 species. The large antennae of the male help to distinguish it, and also tends to 

 make me dovrbt the distinctness of A. grossicornis, Zett. 



*Agromyza vittigera, Zett. — A small species taken by Mr. Verrall at New- 

 market (Suffolk), and by Mr. Malloch at Bonhill (Dumbarton). 



Agromyza luctuosa, Meig., is a reputed British species, and I believe I pos- 

 sess it from Bonhill (Dumbarton), taken by Mr. Malloch. 



*Agromyza verhasci, Bouche. — I have bred this from larvffi, mining the 

 leaves of Verbascum, gathered at Newmarket (Suffolk). 



Agromyza scutellata. Fin., and A. orhona, Meig., both reputed as being British, 

 may be reinstated in the " List," for I consider that I possess specimens of both 

 species. 



* Agromyza xneiventris. Fin. — Not an uncommon species among those with 

 black halteres. I possess it from nvimerous localities. 



* Agromyza cunctans, Meig. — If I have correctly recognised this, it is a 

 common species occurring nearly everywhere that I have collected. 



* Agromyza ynaura, Meig., appears to be a widely distributed species. I have 

 seen it from Suffolk, Essex, and Sussex, also from Scotland and Wales. 



*Agromyza simplex, Lw. — Originally described from America by Loew, it 

 was recognised by Chittenden (1898) as being associated in some way with 

 asparagus in that country. Giard (1904) found it under similar circumstances 

 in France, and I have taken it only by sweeping over asparagus beds here 

 (Suffolk) in Jiily and early August. 



Agromyza curvipalpis, Zett. — This is the A. hicornis, Kalt., recorded as 

 British by Mr. Malloch in this Magazine for 1908, p. 180. Zetterstedt perpetu- 

 ated an unfortunate mistake in naming this species, for he mistook the cliunp 

 of vibrissse for the palpi. 



Agromyza pistacix, Curtis, was described from specimens obtained near Nice 

 in South Evirope, and has no right to appear in a British List ; while A . latipes, 

 Meig., being the same as Madiza latipes, may be struck out. 



I have failed up to the present to recognise the following among British 

 specimens : — A. geniculata, Fin., A. nana, Meig., and A. violse, Curtis. 



*Cerodonta spinicornis, Macq. — Rondani proposed the name Cerodonta for 

 Odontocera, Macq., in 1861, a year before Schiner called the genus Ceratomyza. 

 C. spinicornis may be at once separated from denticornis by its brightly sliining 

 thorax ; it has been taken l>y Mr. Verrall and myself in Norfolk, Suffolk, and 

 Cambridgeshire. 



* Cerodonta lateralis, Zett. — There are three female specimens of this very 

 distinct species, under the name Selachops flavocincta, in the late Mr. Dale's 

 Collection, now at Oxford. 



Selachops flavocincta, Wahlbg. — I have seen no British example of this 

 species, and as it was recorded as British by Mr. Dale upon specimens of 

 Cerodonta lateralis, Zett., it has no right to ajipear in the " List" at present. 



