THE WHALEBONE WHALES OF THE WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC. 3 



to the observation of strauded specimens in various stages of decomposition, in 

 which the natural appearance and relationships of parts were partially or entirely 

 obscured. 



Perhaps the greatest difficulty with which systematic cetology has to deal is 

 the problem of individual variation. The extent to which individuals of the same 

 species vaiy is enormous, and one unacquainted with this fact would be disposed 

 to multiply species liberally, only to find after more extensive comparisons that the 

 characters were slipping away. On account of the extraordinary individual varia- 

 tion in this group of mammals, and the peculiar character of the material, it would 

 seem the pait of wisdom to ti'eat the matter of species conservatively. To a 

 certain extent the absence of definite barriers in the ocean perniits the wliales to 

 range more widely than is usual with land mammals, and on this account geographi- 

 cal races or sub-species ai'e less likely to be formed. Still, from the observations of 

 Scammon and others, it seems probable that sjiecies may in some cases be repre- 

 sented in the ocean by distinct herds, which are distinguishable by various peculi- 

 arities of size, form, proportion, and color. It is not certain, however, that these 

 peculiarities may not be due to difference in sex and age. 



In the study of these animals, the question obtrudes itself whether groups of 

 individuals belonging to certain species when separated fi'om the remainder of the 

 species by the width of a continent, can and do continue to reproduce their kind 

 for an indefinite period without change. To decide the question negatively on a 

 priori grounds, as is the tendency to-day, is, I think, unscientific. 



The pi-esent investigation, in so far as it reaches such questions, appeal's to 

 support the view that detached groups of individuals of a species can perpetuate 

 the characters of the species to which they belong for an indefinite period. 



To find a difference and erect upon it a species, is far easier than to prove that 

 this difference is mei'ely an individual variation or age distinction. Furthermore, 

 species once established, though based on very unsubstantial characters, often 

 acquire a standing which no amount of criticism can affect. Such "species," it 

 would seem, should have anothei- name and be placed in a separate category. On 

 the other hand, reluctance to accept species because the}' add to the length of the 

 list, or to reduce them to synonymy without an examination of the material on 

 which they are based, is to be decried. Between these two erroneous courses I 

 have endeavored to steer in the present work. 



I appreciate that the conclusions airived at here are little more than a confirm- 

 ation of opinions held by Van Benedeu and some other masters of cetology, but 

 with few exceptions these opinions regarding American whales were not based on 

 the examination of American material. If I am not deceived, they proceeded rather 

 from the a priori conclusion that it was not probaI)le that other species existed 

 than those frequenting European waters. 



With the exception of the type of Balcena cisarciica, the types of the Ameri- 

 can species of Cope and Scammon are figured hei-e from jihotographs for the first 

 time. Cope intended to monograph his species, but never brought the work to 

 completion. 



