NOTES. 261 



pipfewl. JBeitrdfie, III, p. 25 (1847). Also some further remarks in 

 Scliles. Entom. Zeitsclir. 18-57; also DrcpaHopliora, ii. gen. of Sapromy- 

 zidae, in Berl. Ent. Zeitschr. XIII, p. 96. See also Ilaliday's note, 

 quoted above, in Nr. 309. 



311. Sapromyza vulgaris Fitch (Chlorop.^). It is easy to recognize 

 this species in the description of Dr. Fitch and in tlie figure. The de- 

 scription of CJiL coitdDKtlis Fitch evidently contains some clerical error, 

 as it describes the antennae as plumose and alludes to those of Cld. 

 ridgaris as iiot plumose, while the latter are represented as plumose in 

 the figure. Mr. Loew followed the letttr] ress and not the figure, and 

 hence called aiitenvalis the species in which I recognize vuJfjaris. (See 

 Loew, Zeitschr. f. Ges. Naturw. XXXVII, p. 117.) 



312. About Coelopa, compare Stenliammar , Copromjzinae Scandi- 

 naviae, 1853. 



313. About the species of Heteroneura occurring in Europe, com- 

 pare Loew, Wien. Ent. Monatsschr., Vol. I, 18;j7, p. 51, and Berl. Ent. 

 Zeitschr. VIII, p. 334—346. 



314. Loew, Centur. VoL II, p. 289, proposes to revive, instead of 

 Anthoph'dina, the older name of this genus Authoniyia Fallen, Spcciiii. 

 Entomol. 1810. The same argument is adduced by him in the Jahrb. 

 d. k. k. Gel. Ges. in Krakau, Vol. XLI. But it seems to me tiiat 

 Ant1iomy:a is too much like AntJioniyia and that there is a serious 

 objection against using names, so nearly alike, in the same order of 

 insects. Furthermore, as the name Anthomyza has been used by 

 Zetterstedt in the sense of Aiitliomyia, its reinstatement, in a different 

 acceptation, would be misleading. "We have therefore the choice bet- 

 ween Lcptowyzn INIacq. (lSo5) and ArdliophiUna Zetterstedt (1838). Dr. 

 Scbiner adopted the former, which, I suppose is the right course; but 

 until the question is decided, I retain the three north anierican species 

 under the name of AnthopjMUna , under which they where originally 

 published by Dr. Loew. 



315. On the ouropeanOpomyzae, seeLoew, Berl Ent. Zeitschr. IX, 1865, 

 p. 26-33. On JJaliojdrra, 1 c. VIII, 1864, p. 347-356. The subgenus 

 Tdhhia Ilaliday, in Westwood's Synopsis, p. 152, seems to have been 

 overlooked. 



316. SeDsidae. The following papers may be consulted:! 



1. Walker, F. Observations on the British Scpsidae (Ent. Magaz. 

 1833, p. 244-256. 



2. Loew, H. Ueber die Gatt. SalhlJa iiherhanpt etc. (Stett. Ent. Z. 

 • 1841, p. 182—193). Contains useful systematic and historic data 



about Scpsidae in general. 



3. Staeger, C. Systematisk Fremstelling af den danske faunas Artcr 

 af Antliatslaegten Sepsis (Kroyei's Tidskr. 1845, p. 22—36). 



4. Van der Wulj). Jets over de in Kederland waargenomen Sepsinen. 

 (Tijdbchr. v. Ent. Ser. 1, Vol. VII, p. 129-144, with a plate. 



317. Ephydridae, as preferable to Ephydrinidae is adopted by Loew, 

 in Cuntur. Vol. U. 



