vin 



THE OOLOGIST 



WHAT THE BIRD PEOPLE SAY. 

 Here is what some of our friends say of us. Lack of space only prevents 

 the publication of some hundreds of other just such comments. Peruse this 

 list, you will note some familiar names, we are sure. THE OOLOGIST. 



The Oologist has improved more and 

 more each month. 



George Finaly Simmons. 

 November 22, 1911. 



The Oologist is very good reading 

 and I would very much dislike to miss 

 a single issue. Although 1 have been 

 acquainted with it for less than two 

 years, I can appreciate the improve- 

 ment that has taken place even in that 

 time. 



Douglass Mabbott. 

 November 27, 1911. 



Of all the interesting Bird Maga- 

 zines none have I found superior to 

 The Oologist. 



Alfred Cookman. 

 November 29, 1911. 



It is the best little paper on birds 

 and eggs that is published, and after 

 14 years I still believe that. It touches 

 a spot that no other paper does. 



Karl B. Squires. 

 December 11, 1911. 



I am now renewing for 1912, find en- 

 closed P. O. order (50c) for The Oolo- 

 gist, the old standby. As long as I 

 can dig up the price I expect to take 

 it. I am glad to see it improving, may 

 its life be long; for it is very useful 

 to collectors, taxidermists, etc., and 

 good reading. It brings us together 

 more and more each year. 



W. G. Savage. 

 December 11, 1911. 



I don't wish to miss a copy. Wish- 

 ing success to The Oologist. 



Basse A. Beck. 

 December 12, 1911. 



The December issue was certainly 

 a fine one. 



Henry Hestness. 

 December 12, 1911. 



You are certainly giving us the 

 finest little Bird Magazine published. 

 The December issue is a hummer. 



Lucius H. Paul. 

 December 14, 1911. 



My December Oologist to hand to- 

 day and is certainly rich in fine cuts. 

 It excells by far in this respect any 

 former issue of the magazine. 



Dr. C. H. Luther. 

 December 26, 1911. 



The December number is certainly 

 all that you have promised us. 



H. O. Green. 

 December 14, 1911. 



The Oologist is improving and it 

 looks like old times again. I have 

 been a subscriber for nearly 25 years 

 and would not be without it for any- 

 thing. 



L. Ernest Marcean. 

 December 26, 1911. 



Your copies are gaining in interest 

 monthly. 



R. J. Longstreet. 

 December 26, 1911. 



Fifty cents for the 1912 Oologist, 

 which I could not do without. 



Mrs. D. S. Brown. 

 January 2, 1912. 



Enclosed find 50 cents in stamps 

 for which please continue my subscrip- 

 tion to The Oologist for another year. 

 If at the end of that time you do not 

 hear from me, please send it on and 

 I will remit at once, as I could not 

 do without it for any length of time. 

 R. F. Lozier. 

 January 3, 1912. 



I like the magazine very much in- 

 deed, and about the 15th of every 

 month I look forward to it greatly. 

 I wish it came twice a month, but I 

 have no place to grumble as I think 

 it has improved wonderfully in the 

 two and one-half years that I have 

 taken it. 



Norman Haultain. 

 January 3, 1912. 



The Oologist is a dandy. Would not 

 be without it. 



Chas. B. Straub. 

 January 15, 1912. 



As for myself, I am on the subscrip- 

 tion lists of 18 magazines, but not a 

 single one is extracted from the outer 

 wrapper with as much promptness as 

 The Oologist. I would be lonesome 

 without it. 



Isaac Hess. 

 January 17, 1912. 



I cannot do without The Oologist, 

 having been a subscriber since 1893. 



G. F. Dippie. 

 January 20, 1912. 



