THE OOLOGIST 



IX 



Last Oologist looks good. Keep it 

 HI). Mr. Short. 



January 19, 1912. 



I have taken The Oologist for more 

 than 22 years and I can't do without 

 it now. It was worth the price at its 

 "worst and now it is at its best. Nuff 

 sed. J. W. Sudgen. 



January 18, 1912. 



Enclosed you will find the very small 

 tax for a very fine paper. I wish to 

 offer my heartiest congratulations for 

 the success of the magazine in the fu- 

 ture and for its vast improvement 

 since you have talven it in hand. The 

 advertising department is a wonder, 

 and the printed matter is mighty in- 

 teresting. The plates of the eagle for 

 January number were fine. 



Miller T. Mercer. 

 January 19, 1912. 



When my subscription runs out 

 don't stoD paper. Dun me at my ex- 

 pense, sue me, call me up on the 

 Long Distance. Do anything but stop 

 The Oologist. 



Thos. S. Hill. 

 January 20, 1912. 



If for any reason my dues should 

 not be forthcoming, please advise me 

 and let The Oologist keep coming, as I 

 do not want to miss any of it. 



R. L. Moore. 

 January 20, 1912. 



My husband subscribed for the first 

 number of Oology in about 1884 and 

 lias interestingly subscribed for it ever 

 since. We always read it and always 

 enjoy it. Mrs. E. F. Gamble. 



January 26, 1912. 



It is like an old friend and I couldn't 

 1)6 without it. 



Pingree I. Osborn. 

 January 27, 1912. 



The magazine is fine, both editorial- 

 ly and typographically and as I am a 

 practical printer and old newspaper 

 publisher, I thinlv I know whereof I 

 ■spealv. Earle Cassidy. 



January 27, 1912. 



The Oologist is improving month by 

 month and is by far the most up-to- 

 date and wide-awalve publication of 

 natural science of tlie times and 

 •should be, in my mind, far above the 

 censure as was given it in a recent 

 issue of the Nature Culture. 



Louis S. Kohler. 

 January 28, 1912. 



I am much pleased with your little 

 magazine and wish you greater suc- 

 cess than ever in your work. 



James A. Rohback. 

 January 29, 1912. 



Let me compliment you on your 

 admirable little magazine. You may 

 consider me a "life" subscriber. 



Minnie Engel. 

 January 31, 1912. 



Enclosed find 50 cents for The Oolo- 

 gist the coming year, the best bird 

 paper in the United States, also please 

 send me December issue, mine must 

 have gotten lost in the mail during 

 the Xmas rush. 



M. A. White, 

 .lanuary 31, 1912. 



Enclosed find a check for fifty cents, 

 for a year's subscription to your very 

 fine little magazine. The Oologist, 

 for the year 1912-1913. 



Samuel Claman. 

 January 31, 1912. 



The paper is fine all the time and 

 I wish you success for the ensuing 

 year. 



C. J. Chamberlain. 

 February 3, 1912. 



I want to congratulate you on the 

 appearance of The Oologist for the 

 past year. 



L. W. Brownell. 

 February 4, 1912. 



I have been getting it now for over 

 twenty years and I find it better and 

 more interesting than it has been in 

 all the years that I have been getting 

 it. George Miller. 



February 5, 1912. 



I must compliment you on getting 

 out a very valuable journal, and hav- 

 ing it out on time. 



John Williams. 

 February 9, 1912. 



I think The Oologist has improved 

 wonderfully since you took hold of it. 



I. Van Kammen. 

 February 16, 1912. 



I am greatly pleased with your lit- 

 tle paper and very much interested in 

 its success. 



Ray Wolfe. 



February 9, 1912. 



I wish to congratulate you on the 

 steady improvement in The Oologist. 



F. P. Drowne, M. D. 

 February 19, 1912. 



