142 ON rXiaCCLABIA neglecta. 



Loc. — Entre Diiranus ot la Riviera, route de Nice ^ Lantosque, 

 27 Juill., 1875, deflorata. 



R. graveolem, Grenier, Fl. Jur., 248. 



Stylis tomentosis in capitulura magnum coarctatia a praccedenti 

 specie diversa. 



15. R. graveolem, Gr., f. Jordani, Des^gl 



Glabritie i.e. pilis deficientibus insignis. Ardoino, Fl. Alp. Marit,, 

 128. 



Hoc. — Prea le Chaudan, ravins, gorges de la Vesubie, alt. env. 

 800 m. 8. ra. 15 Juin, 1875, deflorata. 



16. R. graveolens, Gr., f. Lugdimensis, Desegl. 



Indumt-nto spisso griseo, pilis brevissimis constitute diversa, 

 foliolis obtusis serratura evanida ad f. Billetii, Fugct, accedens. 



£oc. — Entre Levens et Duranus, vis-a-vis le Cros d'Utelle, 21 Mai, 

 1875, florens. 



Adest modificatio glandulis crcberrimis suprafoliarihus singularis, 

 fo'iolis minutis : Loc. — Entre la Bastide de Poux et Sigalc, vail, de 

 I'Esteron, 29 Mai, 1875, florens. 



{To he continued.') 



ON UTRICTJLARIA NEGLECTA, Lehnann : AND ON 



U. BREMII, Heer, AS A BRITISH PLANT. 



By Feed. M. "Wehb. 



On the 1 Sth of September last, when botanising over the tract of low 

 ground that lies to the north of Faversham, called Ham Marshes and 

 Ore Stray, I found at it^ north-west corner, in the broad dike that 

 passes along the inland side of the " sea-wall," a flowering Bladder- 

 wort, which, at the first glance, I perceived was a distinct plant to 

 that I was acc^uainted with under the name of Utricularia vulgaris. 

 The allied species, U. neglecta, of course suggested itself, and afttT- 

 Avards finding the specimens fairly accorded with the description of 

 that species in Babington's " Manual," I so named them, and gave 

 them away as such.* 



The mere discovery of a new locality for U. neglecta I should 

 hardly have thought it worth while to make special notice of in the 

 " Journal of Botany." I did on this occasion what I have been in 

 the habit of doing in similar ca'^es, namely, furnislied a specimen to 

 Mr. "VVutson, with the necessary particulars for liis use, and in his 

 good hands sliould have let the matter rest. In the present instance, 

 however, it interested me to use a subsequent opportunity for in- 

 vestigating what we had on record about the species in question as a 

 constituent of our Flora, and as I believe that in so doing I have met 

 with British specimens of another recognised Continental species of the 



* It is perhaps noteworthy that no Utricularia is mentioned as a Faver- 

 sham plant in Jacobs' " Flora" (1777), or in that of Cowell (183Q), or in the 

 Faverf-ham list published by Rev. H. A. Stowell in the " Phytologist " for 

 1850-7. The only printed rofcrenco I am aware of to any of the genus as occur- 

 ring in thiit niighbourhood is a query regarding f. minor by Dr. M. T. Masters 

 in rhvt. n.s , i , 157. 



