INTRODUCTION 7 



from the accredited representatives of Government, might 

 have been serious for the Gannets of Scotland ; fortunately, 

 however, the " Times " newspaper at once published a strong 

 remonstrance^ from the pen of Professor Newton, and not 

 long afterwards the same able advocate, in conjunction 

 with Mr. H. E. Dresser, brought the matter before the 

 British Association at Dublin. 



A brief being now held for the Gannets, it was soon seen 

 that there was a great deal to be said in their favour, as well 

 as something against them, and in the end the existing law 

 (The Sea-Birds Act of 1869) remained as it was. It has 

 been superseded now by newer legislation, but it is legis- 

 lation under which the Gannet is protected in summer 

 everywhere except at St. Kilda. Though difficult of proof, 

 it is not likely that the removal of the Gannet or any other 

 sea-bird in large numbers, would be followed by a corres- 

 ponding increase of fish, but as a cry for their destruction 

 may again arise, I would not have this book published 

 without advancing a few arguments in favour of the 

 preservation of one of the most beautiful of marine 

 objects. 



(1) In the first place it may be invidious to shift the 

 blame, be it much or little, but as a matter of fact less harm 



* Roprinted in the Report of " The Close Time Committee of the Urit 

 Assce." (1879, i>. 14()). 



