100 [May, 



I fear I must postpone consideration of our other Selandriads to 

 a fresh instalment of these Notes. But I should like here, if I may, 

 to insert a few remarks in completion or correction of what I have 

 said in earlier papers about certain species in the groups there dealt 

 with. 



Ncurotoma flavivenfris, Ketz. — In the table of generic characters 

 I have said that the intercostal n. of Neurotoma is " not forked," and 

 this is generally true ; but on examining further specimens I find 

 that the nerve is sometimes forked, but with the upper limb of the fork 

 broken off short, so that it does not reach the costa as it does in 

 Pamphilius. 



Pamphilius betula?, L. — I was very glad to hear last spring 

 from the Eev. E. 1ST. Bloomfield that this fine insect had again ap- 

 peared in England, the latest previous record known to me being 

 that of Stephens (published in 1835 !) It was taken at Ore, Hastings, 

 on July 1st, 1906, by the Eev. F. de Belamy. The insect (a ? ) has 

 since been forwarded to me, and is now in my charge (February, 1908). 



I have already recorded in this Magazine, but not in the present 

 series of papers, the receipt from Mr. Bloomfield of a British ? of 

 Pamphilius r/yllenhali, Dhlb., the species most closely allied to betulce y 

 having like that sp. the character of a strongly bituberculate " frons." 

 (See Ent. Mo. Mag., March, 1905, p. 63.) 



Pamphilius pallipes, Zett. — In tabulating British Pamphilius I 

 felt and expressed some doubt whether this species should be accepted 

 as native, since I had failed to verify any of our records. Now, 

 however, Mr. E. A. Atmore has sent me a ? which may safely, I 

 think, be referred to it. He took it "in May, 1907, near King's 

 Lynn, Norfolk, by beating birch." 



Janus cynosbati, L. — This insect occurs in the Woking district, 

 though I never found it myself. My kind and valued friend, the late 

 Mr. A. J. Chitty, took it there last year, and presented me with the 

 specimen, on what I little thought would be the last occasion of my 

 visiting him. 



Janus lutcipes, Lep.— I mentioned this (in November, 1903) as 

 a form of cynosbati, but in Konow's Monograph of Chalastogastra, 

 now in course of publication, it is treated as a distinct species. 



Mr. Edelsten has been good enough to give me a $ which he 

 obtained in a strange situation, viz., from cocoons of Sesia andreni- 

 formis on Viburnum. He naturally thought it must be an Ichneumonid ; 



