LOCHLEVEN TKOUT 



ABDOMIXAL 

 MAI.ACOI'TEKYGll. 



SALMOMD^. 



THE LOCHLEVEN TROUT. 



Sulino Levetteiisis, VValkek. 

 ,, ctecij'er, Parnell. 



I AM indebted to Dr. Parnell for the loan of a beautiful 

 specimen of this Trout from Avhich the figure was taken, and the 

 following account of it by Dr. Parnell is from the seventh 

 volume of the Memoirs of the Wernerian Natural History 

 Society of Edinburgh. 



" This fish is considered by most writers on British Ich- 

 thyology to be identical with Sahno Jario, the common 

 Trout, differing from it only in the colour of the flesh, and 

 in having no red sjjots on the sides. It is true that food and 

 season may have a great share in diminishing or increasing 

 the external markings and colour of the flesh ;* but they can 

 have no effect in shortening or lengthening the rays of the 

 fins, or in adding numbers to the csecal appendages." 



" The differences that exist between S. cacifer and »S'. 



* James Stuart Monteatli, Esq. of Closeburn, caught a number of small river 

 Trout, and transferred tlieni to a lake (Loch Ettric-k) where they grew rapidly ; 

 their flesh, which previously exhibited a while chalky appearance, became in a 

 short time of a deep red, while their external appearance reniained the same from 

 the time tliey were fiist put in. 



