CATALOGUE OF DIURNAL LEPIDOPXEUA. 105 



Var. Bootes, 



Eumenis ? Bootes, Hiibner, Eur. Schmeft. i. figs. 1025-1028 



(1805). 

 Chionobas Bootes, Bolsduval, Icon. Hist. Lep. p. 191. n. 5, pi. 37. 



figs. 4-6 (1832) ; var. $ , Herricli-ScMiffer, tab. 80 (1845). 

 Satynis Bootes, Duponchel, Lep. de France, i. p. 211. n. 73, 



pi. 32. figs. 3-5 (1832). 

 Papilio Bore, Huhner, Eur. Schmett. i. pi. 29. figs. 134-136 



(1805) ; also of OcJtsenheimer. 

 Chionobas Taygetc (part.), Herrich-Schiiffer, Eur. Schmett. i. 



tab. 24. figs. 112, 113 (1845). 



Lapland, Labrador. B.M. 



This form is now generally allowed to be no more than a variety. 

 of Bore. It may be distinct ; for the central band is not identical 

 Avith that of Bore, being much less irregular and better defined. 

 The upperside of the wings is of a brighter ochre-colour "\\dth darker 

 lines, and the underside less streaked with minute striae. However, 

 it may be as well to consider it nothing more than a race. 



18. (Eneis pumilus. 



Chionobas pumilus, Felder, Reise der Fregatte Novara, iii. tab. 69. 

 figs. 6, 7 (1867). 



Eastern Himalayas. 



Seems closely allied to Bore of Esper ; but according to Felder it 

 is distinct from all the known species. 



Genus 58. AKGYNNINA, Butler (1807). 



1. Argynnina Hobartia. 



Lasiommata Hobartia, Westivood in Oen. Diiirn. Lepid. p. 387. 



n. 21 (1851). 

 Argynnina Hobartia, Bvtler, Ann. Jf Mag. Nat. Hist. 3rd ser. 



xix. p. 165. n. 1 (1867). 

 Lasiommata Lasus, Heiuitson, Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 3rd ser. 



ii. p. 248. n. 9, pL 16. fig. 5 (1865). 



Van Diemen's Land. B.M. 



2. Argynnina Lathoniella. 



Lasiommata ? (Xenica) Lathoniella, Westivood in Gen. Diurn. 



Lepid.-p.3S7.n. 25(1851). 

 Argynnina Lathoniella, Butler, Ann. l^~ Mag. Nat. Hist. 3rd ser. 



xix. p. 165. n. 2, see pi. 4. fig. 6 (1867). 



Van Diemen's Land. B.M. 



