220 MAMMALIAN DESCENT. [Lect. IX_ 



lie for God, as one man Avill do for another, to gratify liim ? For 

 certain it is that God worketh notliinjf in nature but by second causes;, 

 and if they would have it otlierwise believed, it is mere imposture, as 

 it were in favour towards God ; and notliing else but to offer to the 

 Author of Truth the xmclean sacrifice of a lie. But farther, it is an 

 assured trutli, and a conclusion of experience, that a little of super- 

 ficial knowledge of philosophy may incline the mind of man to 

 atheism, but a farther proceeding therein doth bring the mind back 

 again to religion : for in the entrance of philosophy, when the second 

 causes, which are next unto the senses, do offer themselves to the mind 

 of man, if it dwell and stay there, it may induce some oblivion of the 

 highest cause ; but when a man passeth on farther, and seeth the 

 dependence of causes, and the works of Providence ; then, according 

 to the allegory of the poets, he will easily believe that the highest 

 link of nature's chain must needs l)e tied to the foot of Jupiter's 

 chair. To conclude, therefore, let no man, upon a weak conceit of 

 sobriety or an ill-applied moderation, think or maintain that a man 

 can search too far, or be too well studied in tlie Ijook of God's word, 

 or in the book of God's works ; divinity or philosophy ; but rather 

 let men endeavour an endless progress or proficience in both ; only 

 let men beware that they apply both to charity, and not to swelling j. 

 to use, and not to ostentation ; and again, that tliey do not unwisely 

 mingle or confoimd these learnings together." 



The niost capable of those whose studies lie in the domains of 

 philosophy and theology are quite willing that the biologist slioidd 

 carry his own proper researches as far as his faculties and opportuni- 

 ties will permit. Dr "VVestcott's views on this matter are well worthy 

 C)f attention : — ■ 



" There can be no antagonism," he says, " between Theology and 

 Science as they are connnonly contrasted. So far as these keep within 

 their proper limits, they move in distinct regions. Their respective 

 paths lie in parallel, and therefore in unintersecting, planes. Theology 

 deals with the origin and destiny of things : science with things as 

 they are according to human observation of them. Theology claims 

 to connect this world with the world to come : Science is of this 

 world only. Theology is confessedly partial, provisional, analogical 

 in its expression of truth : Science — that is, liuman science — can be 

 complete, final, and absolute in its enunciation of the laws of pheno- 



