[119] CATALOGUE OF THE FISHES OF NORTH AMERICA. 



Family CXXXV.— CHIASMODONTID^. (1206.) 



469.— CHIASMODON Johnson. (446) 



1437. Chiasmodon niger Johnson. B. (1250) 



Family OXXXVI— BLENNIIDiE. (114) 



470.— OPHIOBLENNIUS Gill. (401) 



1438. Ophloblennius -webbi Valenciennes. W. P. (1152) 



471.— CHASMODES Cuv. & Val. (402) 



1439. Chasmodes bosquianus Liic^pMe. S. (1153) 



1440. Chasmodes quadrifasciatus Wood. S. (1154) 



1441. Chasmodes saburrae Jordan «fc Gilbert. S. (1154 6.) 



472.— HYPSOBLENNIUS ' Gill. (403) 



1442. Hypsoblennius brevipinnis * Giinther. P. 



1443. Hypsoblennius gentilis Girard. C.P. (1155 6.) 



1444. Hypsoblennius gilberti Jordan. C. (1155) 



1445. Hypsoblennius puuctatus 3 Wood. S. (1156,11566.) 



1446. Hypsoblennius ionthas Jordan & Gilbert. S. (1156c.) 



1447. Hypsoblennius scrutator Jordan &. Gilbert. S. (1156d.) 



473.— HYPLEUROCHILUS Gill. (404) 



1448. Hypleurochilus multifilis Girard. S. (1157) 



1449. Hypleurochilus geminatus Wood. S. (11.58) 



474.— BLENNIUS Linnaeus. (405) 

 § Blennius. 



1450. Blennius stearnsi < Jordan & Gilbert. W. (1159 6.) 



1451. Blennius favosus Goode »fe Bean. W. (1159 c.) 



1452. Blennius asterias Goode «fe Bean. W. (1159 d.) 



§ Pholia Cuv. & Val. 



1453. Blennius carolinus Cnv. «& Val. S. (1160) 



' The generic name Hypsohlennius Gill (Cat. Fish. East Coast U. S., 1861 ; H. hentzi) 

 introduced without definition or explanation is equivalent to Isesthes Jordan & 

 Gilbert. If it be thought best to adopt such nominanuda, Hypsoblennius has prece- 

 dence over Isesthes. 



^Blennius brevipinnis Giinther, Cat. Fishes, III, 226. Mazatlan, southward. This 

 species is a genuine Isesthes, as is also the Blennius siriatus of Steindachner, from 

 Panama. 



3 Isesthes hentzi should be erased. It is identical with Isesthes punotaius, as given on 

 page 758 of the Synopsis. 



* Blennius fucorum should be erased. It is a tropical species introduced into our 

 faunal lists by DeKay, on information which was probably erroneous. 



