MAMMALIAN ALVEOLINGUAL SALiVARY AREA 



retroKngual position forward beyond this levr^l ;■ f 



-ample, in the pig, in which condition it tfiuei bv r ^"!"\!^' ^- 



Finally, the subHnLnni;. m.,; ^ ^ Ranvier himself. 



c^^^:n;:^^i:i ''- "»^'«".^ »' "-^ e«e„s,-„„ 



position In thi. ^ further growth, intoa retrolingual 



peculiar ZbleM '„"f,,'' f ";™™" »' »„varge„ce. While the 

 naturally assu3 „ b d ved Z'^' "T ""' """^ ""^ "-" 

 quence the orifice of a ind'rJZrt ""■""^' ■■'"'' '" "-- 

 .0 offer ,he ™„s. impof, >: eXc/oVus s't r'"/ T '°™''' """ 

 qucslion the variations „( the orifice .rtr '■;" ^'""' "■" 



Further, Chievitz had described two ,x„itio„s otrh, I ,1 ""■ 



developmental evidence dseree*^ 'see™ ,f ^'7 ''""^"*'' 

 influenced his views His!!, f, ""'''"'>' "'»' """e facts 



who, iufluenc:dT his?n?„ ;:^7LSr ''7r "' '"''"'■ 



- a/eoiin^aitrt^^crni'aiirir;:* 'trh"^ °' 



not be shown to have exerted -, rl.Vn.f • a ^ ^'"^ ^'^ ^^"- 



criteria of the latter belon to .1 ^ r'd Zfor" "Tf' '" "" 

 Reichel, and Zumstein wMfe awafelTl , T-" ' "°™"''''' 



a.».utea„darbitrar.diWsio7o7.he;l'n^d«t:r,fei::str^^^ 



