ERRATA AND ADDENDA. 



Page 



17. Pipuncidus annulifemur should strictly not be designated " sp. nov ," as 

 it was described by the present author in Bull. Ent. Eesearch, xii, 

 part 4, p. 469 (Feb. 1922). As stated there, and again in the present 

 Tolutue, it was described irom two males, the type and another, now 

 in the British Museum. A female was, however, figured from an 

 example not submitted to the present author, and this figure appeared 

 in the plate following the original description (/. c. pi. xv, fig. 6). This 

 plate illustrates a paper by T. Y. Subraiuaniam, in which P. annuli- 

 femur is stated to parasitise the three mango Jassids, Idiocerus iiiveo- 

 spro'sug, atkinsoni, and clypealis. 



47. References under Mclanodomn ambiguum : for " Sccsva ambiguum " read 

 " Scceva ambigua." The third reference should read " Syrphus mo7io- 

 cheetus, Loew, Beschr. Eur. Dipt, ii, p. 224 (1871)," and the fourth 

 should read " Scceva hyperborea, Holmgren, Ofvers. Vet.-Akad. 

 Forhandl. xxix, no. 6, p. 100 (1872)." 



o4. Sixth reference under Asaixina agrota: for " Syrphu:^ ivfirma" read 

 " Syrphus it/frmus." 



76. Third reference uuder Syrphus forvns: for " Sccbvu topiar/us" read 

 " SccBva topiaria." 



82. References under Syrjjhus balfeaius : the date under Musca scitidiis 

 should be 1782, not 1776. The fourth reference should read " Musca 

 alternafa, Schrank, Enum. Ins. Austr. p. 448 (1781)." Fifih reference ; 

 for " Musca neclarcus " read "' S//?-pkus iieciarcus." 



85. After the heading " SyrphuS COrollSB, Fabr." add " (PI. II, fig. 18.)."' 



87. The last reference under Syrphus latifasciatus should read " Scceva abbrc^ 

 viata, Zetterstedt, Dipt. Scand. viii, p. 3136 (1849)." 



95. Line 21 from top: for " citinfasciaturn" read " citrofascia/u/ji." 



103. Top line: i'or " Kercesz " read " Kertesz." 



19(). Line 13 I'roui bottom : for '• Magaspis " read " Megaspis." 



