210 



1880 Oudemans, in Tijdschr. v. Entom. v. 23, p. XVII. 



1880 Glyciphagus destructor Oudemans in Tijdschr. v. Entom., v. 



23, p. XVII. 

 1882 Acarus spinipes Berlese in Att. R. Ist. Ven. Sc. Lett. Art., 



ser. 5, v. 8, p. 27 (sép.) 



1882 Tyroglyphus spinipes Megnin in Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. ser. 6, 

 v. 1, n° 4, Buil. p. CXXXI. 



1883 Acarus spinipes Berlese in Buil. Soc. Ent. Ital., v. 25, p. 220. 



1884 Glycyphagus spinipes Berlese Ac. Myr. Scorp. Ital., fase. 

 14, n°. 2. 



1884 Berlese Note rel. Acar. etc, fase. 1, p. 10. 



1888 Glyciphagus spinipes Canestrini, I Tiroglifidi, p. 19. 



(nou 1888 Michael! in Journ. Linn. Soc. Lond.) 



1888 Canestrini Prospetto Acarof. Ital. v. 3, p. 381, t. 27, f. 1. 



1890 Glycyphagus spinipes Moniez in Rev. Biol. Nord Fr., p. 27. 

 1894 Glyciphagus spinipes Moniez in Rev. Biol. Nord Fr. v. 6. p. 450. 

 1898 Glycyphagus spinipes Oudemans in Tijdschr. v. Entom., v. 

 40, p. 252. 



?? 1899 Canestrini et Kramer Demod. et Sarcopt (Das Tier- 



reich), p. 147. 



(non 1901 Michael! Brit Tyrogl.) 



1903 Oudemans in Entom. Bericht, p. 102. 



Here follows a short discussion of the contents of the above 

 mentioned articles. If an author has not given a description, 

 nor a drawing, or only facts which were already known at his 

 time, I do not discuss his article. 



1776. With the most certainty we may admit that Schrank's 

 mite is the same as that which afterwards is called destructor or 

 spinipes. It was found in a box with dried caterpillars ; the form 

 of the body is long, wider "anteriorly, a little coustricted before 

 the insertion of the third pair of legs; the hairs are longer than 

 the body; these are the best proofs of my assertion. 



1781. Schrank calls his »Acarus subbilobo" Acarus cadaverum, 

 indeed a very characteristic name ! The name is older than destructor. 



1781. Schrank's Acarus destructor is most certainly the same 



