December, '09] JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 403 



1903. Holland, W. J., Moth Book, 422, pi. XLVIII, fig. 32. Archips. 



1904. Gibson, A., 34th Rept. Ent. Soc. Ont., 57, fig. Archips. 



1904. Washburn, F. L., 9th Rept. St. Ent. Minn., 54, fig. 39. Caccecia. 



1905. Currie, R. P., Bull. 53, Bur. Ent., U. S. Dept. Agr., 15, 34. Archips. 



1905. Kellogg, V. L.., American Insects, 380. Caccecia. 



1906. Felt, E. P., Ins. Aff. Park and Woodland Trees, II, 512, 580-81. Archips. 



vicariana Walker. 

 1863. Walker, F., List Lepid. Ins. Brit. Mus., XXVIII, 287. Teras. 

 1882. Fernald, C. H., Trans. Am. Ent. Soc, X, 10.=C. rosaceana Harr. 



gossypiana Packard. 

 1869. Packard, A. S., Guide to Study of Insects, 335. Lozotcenia. 

 1855. Glover, T., Agr. Rept. U. S. Patent Office, 82, pi. VI, fig. 10. Tortrix? 

 1882. Fernald, C. H., Trans. Am. Ent. Soc, X, 10. = C. rosaceana. 



articana Moeschler. 

 1874. Moeschler, H. B., Stett. Ent. Zeit., XXXV, 164. Tortrix. 

 1882. Fernald, C. H., Trans. Am. Ent. Soc, X, 10.=C. rosaceana. 



THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF AMERICAN 



TICKS 



By W. A. HooKEK, Washington, D. C. 



In the fourth part of the last memoir of his revision of the ticks, 

 published in 1901. Prof. L. G. Neumann considers their geographical 

 distribution, the species being brought together under the various 

 political divisions of the world in which they are known to occur. 

 The North American species listed are largely based upon the Marx 

 collection of the United States National Museum and the collection 

 of the Bureau of Animal Industry of the United States Department 

 of Agriculture. 



Since this account was published there has been an increased activ- 

 ity in the collection of ticks in this country which has resulted in the 

 discovery of many new forms and of a wider distribution of the 

 species recorded than was then known. In Neumann's "Notes sur 

 ies Ixodides." which have followed the "Memoirs," new records 

 have been given which include data on American species. With the 

 appearance of Banks' Revision of the ticks of this country, several 

 new species were described and a number of names were relegated 

 to synonyms through the recognition of Say's and Packard's species. 

 In preparing his "Revision." Mr. Banks examined the collection of 

 the Museum of Comparative Zoology, which contains Packard's types, 



