f 21fi 



ajiical iiiUcli ; then' is no pule Hue het'ore li^ uud no palf costal tiieii. The bhiek 

 |iatch oil the liiudwing is restricted, longer ul 8M- than lit W, and uppeiu^ 

 siuuate betweeu 51' and SM- ; there are tawny brown scales between this patch 

 and the apex of the wing. The individual came from N. India, and has no more 

 precise locality. A c? in the Oxford Museum from E. India (Hutton) agrees well 

 with this $ . Another S in the British Museum, from the Leech collection, obtained 

 by Captain Young at Kulu, belongs doubtless to this species. It is very pale, as jiale 

 as the \)&\est p/ialnj-is. It agrees with undulosa in the midtibiae not being white 

 above like the hindtibia and in the presence of a black streak on the underside 

 of the forewing. The specimen is c.om2)aratively small, the forewing measuring 

 only 47 mm. in length ; the lines of the forewing are scarcely traceable, the black 

 2")atch of the hindwing is still more restricted than in the type of deucalion, the 

 black scaling not extending beyond the end of the cell betweeu R' and SC-, while 

 the area between cell and apex of wing is shaded with pale tawny. The two males 

 differ structurally from undulosa in the following points : the hindtibia is as long 

 as the first tarsal segment, and this barely longer than segments :^ to 5 together ; 

 the terminal ])air of spurs is very unequal, shorter than in undulosa, the long one 

 only half the length of the first tarsal segment. The genital armature is as in 

 undulosa, but the lobes of the tenth tergite are somewhat slenderer, and the sternite 

 is rounded. 



The shorter distal margin of the forewing, the reduced, sinuate, black patch 

 of the hindwing, the absence from the forewing of a pale costal area and of a 

 white line before W, the shorter spurs of the hindtibia, and shorter first hindtarsal 

 segment, are the principal characters by which this species can be distinguished 

 from undulosa. 



The laiva mentioned by Forsayeth, Lc, may belong to this or some other 

 species. 



Hab. N. and N.W. India. 



In the British Museum 1 c?, 1 ? from N. India and Kulu. lu the Oxford 

 Museum 1 i from E. India. Not seen in other collections. 



178. Clanis euroa spec. uov. 



(? ?. In colour and pattern and the proportions of the tibiae, spurs and tarsi 

 close to the much larger CI. titan. Differs as follows : front of head and end of palpus 

 blackish, black mesial line of occiput and collar heavier ; distal margin of forewing 

 in both sexes about 6 mm. shorter than internal one, the distal edge of the jiale 

 area of the forewing more oblique between R^ and R-, the blackish line proximally 

 of subcostal fork reaching down to R^, not developed to a large cloud or patch, the 

 following line barely indicated, the line halfway between fork and apical patch 

 rather stronger marked than in tUa)i. On the underside only the external one of 

 the three discal lines of the forewing is indicated, and there is on the hindwing just 

 a faint trace of the middle one of the three lines. 



(S . The differences in the sexual organs of the 6 are very marked : the harjie 

 (PI. XXXII. f. 9) is raised to a low submesial ridge cut, which fades away distally 

 into the irregular folding of the inner sheath of the clasper, and which ends 

 proximally in a pointed small tubercle. The dorsal process pd of the clasper is 

 similar to tliat of phalaris. The tenth tergite (PI. XXIV. f. 2) is deeply sinuate, 

 the lobes are much broader than in tttaii and less sharply hooked (PI. XXIII. 

 f. 26) ; the sternite is truncate, with the angles rounded and somewhat curved dorsad. 



