ABKA.Md-LEUCMSCINK IIVlililDS. 



811 



cuinstance L'spcciallv (listiiict iti tlic form of tlie liud}' 

 and tlu' situation of the dorsal fin. Tlic Hiis are soiuc- 

 what damaged; l)ut the length to the tip of the lower 

 caudal lobe was probably almost 23 em. The length 

 of the body (to the end of the middle eaudal rays is 

 199 mm. Greatest depth 32-2 % of the length of the 

 body, least depth 9'.t % of the same. Greatest thick- 



fin 17-1 %, of the length of the body. I'eetoral fins 

 ecpial in length to the base of the anal tin, ventral 

 tins 15' 2 "" "' '^be length of the bod\'. Distance be- 

 tween the latter lins and tlu^ ti]) of the snout 87'2 % 

 of that between the dorsal tin and the same point. 

 Length of the middle ean(hd rays 7'5 % of that of 

 the body. Aliove the lateral line 10 scales, below 



•;i„"i-i; i^vuhi'si'-aSiSSi!^***" ' 



Fig. 202. Bliccopsis vutilo-blicca from the E. Hclgc at Kristiftiistsid, taken April 17, 1869. Xatnral size, .\mong tlie stuffed 



specimens in the Museum of Kristianstad School. 



ness 39 % of the greatest depth. Length of the head | it H, in an oblique transverse row from the inser- 

 2ri % of that of the body, postorbital length of the | tion of the ventral fin. Scales in the lateral line 47. 

 head 47'() % of its entire length. Distance from the Fin-formula identical witji that of tlie preceding 



tip of the snout to the beginning of the dorsal fin 

 5r3 %, base of the dorsal fin 12'3 %, of the length 

 of the budw Distance from the tip of the snout to 

 the beginning of the anal fin (i2'2 %, base of the said 



hybrid. 



This latter hybrid is thus distinguished from the 

 White Bream niainl\- by a tliicker body and a shorter 

 anal fin. 



