202 CATALOGUE OF UNGULATES 



but whether this is due to the effects of light, or is a 



character of the youug animal, is not apparent. Same history. 



70. 2. 10. 33. Skull, with horns, immature. Same 



locality and collector. Same history. 



The following names have been applied by Heude, Mem. 

 Hist. Nat. Eiii'p. Chinois, to members of this group from 

 Indo-China, etc. : — 



(1) Capricornis maritimus, vol. ii, p. 4, note, 1888, ihid. p. 226, 

 1894. Tonkin. 



(2) Caiyricornis rocherianus, voL ii, p. 225, 1894. Along. 



(3) Capricornis venetianus, ibid. p. 227, 1894. Along. 



(4) Capricornis maxiUaris, ibid. p. 229, 1894. Chao-Hing. 



(5) Ca2)rico7'nis cornutus, (6) erythrojjygius, (7) microdonticus, (8) 

 ungulosus, (9) fargesianus, (10) brachyrhinus, (11) nasuttis, (12) 

 pugnax, (13) longicornis, (14) chrijsochcetes, vol. ii, pp. 232, 233, 1894. 

 Sze-chuan and other parts of China. 



(15) Capricornis inarcolinus, vol. iii, p. 151, 1896. Tonkin. 



(16) Capricornis vidianus, ibid. p. 154, 1896. Anam. 



The names C. p>latyrhinus and C. berthelianus are also quoted by 

 Pocoek. Of the above, maritimus is the type of Lithotragus, see 

 Pocock, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 8, vol. i, p. 188, 1908. 



Ill— Genus NEMORH^DUS. 



Naemorhedus, H. Smith, Griffith's Anim. Kingdom, vol. v, p. 352, 



1827, in part ; Pocock, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 8, vol. i, p. 187, 



1908, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1910, p. 853. 

 Naemorhaedus, Jardine, Nat. Libr. vol. iv, p. 277, 1836. 

 Kenias, Ogilhy, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1836, p. 138, nee Cemas, Oken. 

 Nemorhedus, Gray, List Mamm. Brit. Mus. pp. xxvi and 160, 1843, 



Cat. Ungulata Brit. Mies. p. 112, 1852, Cat. Buminants Brit. 



Mus. p. 41, 1872. 

 Urotragus, Gray, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, vol. viii, p. 372, 1871, 



Cat. Buminants Brit. Mus. p. 21, 1872; Lydehker, Great and 



Small Game of India, etc. p. 136, 1900, Game Animals of India, 



etc. p. 148, 1907. 

 Nemorhaedus, Floiuer and Garson. Cat. Osteol. Mus. B. Coll. Surg. 



pt. ii, p. 254, 1884, in part ; Lydehker, Cat. Hume Bequest Brit. 



Mus. p. 26, 1913. 

 Cemas, Blanford, Fauna Brit. India, Mamm. p. 516, 1891. 



Size much the same as in smaller species of Capricornis, 

 from which the present genus differs by the absence of face- 

 glands, and of lachrymal pits for their reception, as well as 

 by the obtuse angle formed in the profile at the junction of 



