Zoologischer Anzeiger 



herausgegeben 



von Prof. Eugen Korscheit in Marburg. 



Zugleich 



Organ der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft. 



Bibliograpliia zoologica 

 bearbeitet von Dr. H. H. Field (Concilium bibliographicum) in Zürich. 



Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann in Leipzig. 



XXXVII. Band. 



17. Januar 1911, 



Nr. 2. 



Inhalt: 



I. Wlsüenhchaftlicho mttellnngren. 



1. Pilsbry, On the nomenclature of Cirripudia. 



S. H3.' 



2. O'Donoshue, Two cases of abnormal liearts 



and one of an abnormal Anterior Ab lominal 

 vein in the frog. (With 3 figs.) S 35. 



3. Berry, Anew Sepiolid from Japan. (With 1 fig.) 



S. 39. 



4. Dahl, Die Tierpsychologie, ein Zweig der Zoo- 



logie. S. 41. 



5. Hadii, Lamarck, l>er Begründer der Lehre 



vom Stammbaum. S. 54. 



6. Steche, Die Fi.rhuBg\onl>ixippiii morosiis.S.fHi. 

 II. Mitteilan^en ans Museen, Instituten usw. 



1. Thieneiiiauu, Das Sammeln von Puppenhäuten 



der C'hironomiden. S. 62. 



2. Zacharias, Biologische Station zu Plön. S. 63. 



3. Ergänznn^^en und Nachträge zu dem Per- 



Ronalrerzeichnis zoologischer Anstalten. 

 S. (J3. 



III. Personal-Notizen. S. G4. 

 Literatur. S. 273—28». 



I. Wissenschaftlich© Mittellungen. 



1. On the nomenclature of Cirripedia. 



By Henry A. Pilsbry, Philadelphia. 



eingeg. 25. August 1910. 



In his recent report upon »Die Cirripedien der Deutschen Siid- 

 polar-Expedition 1901 — 1903« Prof. A. Gruvel has devoted many 

 pages to a critique of my work on the Cirripedes of the United States 

 National Museum, published in 1907. His strictures if unanswered 

 might lead some students to heed the warning he sounds against what 

 he considers my dangerous heresies. 



Prof. Gruvel's criticisms relate to two aspects of the subject; to 

 questions of nomenclature, and to those of classification. 



In nomenclature he objects to my use of Mitella Oken, 1815, in 

 place of Pollici'pes Leach,. 1817, and Octolasmis Gray, 1825, in place of 

 Dkhelaspts Darwin 1851; he also ignores the earlier name 'Trilaam is 

 Hinds 1844, in favor of a later one, PoecUasma Darwin 1851. 



In all of these cases the earlier generic names used by me were 

 properly proposed , and there has never been any question as to their 

 pertinence to the groups. M. Gruvel's sole objection io Mitella is that 

 PolUcii)es is in general use, while be rejects Octolasmis and Trilasiuis 



3 



