220 APPENDIX. BEDUVTTDiE. 



described from other regions, though in subsequent j^apers he 

 solved these problems, Fieber may probably have intended to 

 liave acted in the same manner, and as there is no doubt as to his 

 genus, in this case I follow Breddin rather than Eeuter. 



Acanthobrachys nitidula, Stal (Nabis), Frcff. IJiu/. resa, Ins. Hem. 



p. 2(31 (]8o!t): /(/. (Arbela) Of v. Vet.-Ak. Fork. 1870, p. 764; 



Bent. Mem. Soc. Ent. Behj. xv, p. 12-j (1908). 

 Lorichius umbonatus, Dist. (vol. ii, p. 402). 



Eeuter, who has examined a large number of specimens, states 

 that the above are identical. Stal in describing Arhela did so 

 from a female specimen, and thus missed the male character 

 of the posterior tibiae globosely clavate near base, by which I was 

 misled. 



Add : Hah. Bengal; Mougbyr (Je»Ams). Aniiam, Java, Sumatra, 

 Borneo, New Guinea. New Hebrides {fide Beuter). 



Subfamily VELOCIPEDIN^i]. 



Velocipediuaj, Benjr. Wien. ent. Zeit. x, p. 265 (1891). 



A subfamily founded by Bergroth for the reception of the 

 following genus. Bergroth placed it in the family Saldidse, where 

 1 did not look for it, nor where do I still regard it as happily 

 placed. I was, however, very much more in error in locating it 

 where I did, though I wrote " Godefridus is included though 

 somewhat aberrant." 



Genus VELOCIPEDA to replace Godefridus. 



(Vol. II, p. 328.) 



Velocipeda, Bergr. Wien. ent. Zeit. x, p. 263 (1891). 

 Godefridus, Dist. (vol. ii, p. 328). 



Velocipeda aliena. 



Godefridus alienus, Dist. (vol. ii, p. 329). 



Velocipeda prisca. Kirk, {nee Beryr.) Trans. Am. Ent, Soc, xxii, 

 p. 149 (1906). 



