Periodical Literature 137 



Average Average Average 

 Number Diameter Height Volume 

 of f S t a n d 



Trees Inches Feet Cu. Ft. 



SITE III 



1. Oak, 160 years, in open management (Wimmenauer). 



45 19 97 4404 105 5935 10879 



2. Oak, 160 years, under moderate thinning in subdominate (Wimmenauer). 



86 19 94 7579 88 3661 11240 



3. Oak, 160 years, under regular thinning in practice (Schwappach). 



89 16 76 4690 53 5105 9796 



4. Pine, 140 years, in open management (Wimmenauer). 



81 18 87 4762 53 6149 10911 



5. Pine, 140 years, under moderate thinning (Vorkampff-Lorey). 



133 15 87 6106 35 3704 8090 



6. Pine, 140 years, imder sever thinning (Schwappach). 



117 14 77 8004 35 5205 9209 



7. Pine, 140 years, under moderate thinning in subdominant (Schwappach). 



179 13 84 5977 35 2789 8766 



8. Beech, 140 years, under severe opening in dominant (Wimmenauer). 



105 14 95 5420 53 5563 10982 



9. Beech, 140 years, moderate thinning in subdominant (Wimmenauer). 



162 13 95 7307 35 3418 10725 



10. Beech, 140 years, moderate thinning in subdominant (Eberhard). 



202 12 91 7064 35 2960 10024 



11. Beech, 140 years, moderate and severe thinning in subdominant (Wimmer). 



6864 4590 11454 



12. Beech, 140 years, moderate and severe thinning in Subdominant (Schwap- 



pach). 



93 6335 .. 4705 11054 



13. Beech, 140 years, moderate and severe thinning in subdominant (Grundner) 



117 16 96 7879 70 3747 11626 



14. Fir, 120 years, moderate thinning in subdominant (Lorey). 



243 14 87 10425 35 3975 14440 



15. Fir, 120 years, moderate and severe thinning in subdominant (Eichhom). 



239 14 84 10139 35 5520 15659 



16. Spruce, 120 years, severe and open thinning in dominant (Schwappach). 



187 13 93 7036 35 6793 13828 



17. Spruce, 120 years, moderate thinning in subdominant (Schwappach). 



324 12 85 10210 35 3375 13585 



18. Spruce, 120 years, severe and open thinning (Grundner). 



182 15 93 9081 53 5949 15029 



19. Spruce, 120 years, moderate thinning in subdominant (Lorey). 



288 12 91 10182 35 3790 13971 



Ueber die Abhdngigkeit der Ertragsregelung und Bestandspflege vom Versuchs- 

 wesen. AUgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitimg, May, 1915, pp. 112-6. 



Oberforstrat Frey demolishes the method 



Simplified of forest expectancy and cost values in 



Practical determining the value of a forest for practical 



Forest purposes. He contends that exchange value. 



Valuation the result of compromise and agreement of 



two subjective estimates in the market, is 



the only rational one — a judgment based on commonsense, 



